Here’s a breakdown of the provided text, focusing on the key players and events:

The Core Issue: Apple is suing Jon Prosser, a tech leaker, for allegedly revealing confidential information about unreleased iOS updates.Key Players:

Apple: The tech giant that is suing for the leak of its confidential information.
Jon Prosser: A tech leaker who is accused of receiving and disseminating information about unreleased iOS updates.
Christian Ramacciotti: An Apple employee who allegedly accessed a growth phone and provided information to Prosser.
Ethan Lipnik: Another Apple employee who was fired by the company for allegedly failing to protect confidential information, specifically related to the development phone that Ramacciotti is accused of accessing.

The Allegations (According to Apple’s Lawsuit):

Christian Ramacciotti, an Apple employee, accessed a development phone containing confidential information about unreleased iOS updates.
Ramacciotti then allegedly provided this information to Jon Prosser.
Prosser, in turn, revealed these details through his videos and social media posts, including calling it “the biggest iOS leak ever.”
Apple claims Ramacciotti acted as he “needed money.”
Apple also alleges that Prosser instructed Ramacciotti on how to “act this out.”

Prosser denies Apple’s version of events.
He states that the details Apple has been given are “not accurate.”
He claims he had “no knowledge of how the info was obtained.”
He denies that Ramacciotti told him he “needed money.”
He emphatically denies instructing Ramacciotti to “act this out.”
Prosser acknowledges revealing the information but claims he didn’t know how it was obtained.
He expresses regret that Ethan Lipnik was fired and wishes Apple had contacted him for more information.

The Aftermath:

Ethan Lipnik, the employee whose development phone was allegedly accessed, was fired by Apple for failing to follow policies protecting confidential information.
Apple has not responded to requests for comment.
Ethan Lipnik has also not responded to requests for comment.

Sag calls it a “notable lawsuit.”
he notes a “disparity between what Prosser is saying and what Apple alleges,” especially since the employee (Lipnik) seemed unaware of what was going on.
He highlights that while the data was taken from a development device, Apple should have vetted how the data was acquired and were it came from before releasing details.
He points out that Apple has more legal power and laws to support its efforts when leaks happen within the US, unlike many historical leaks that originated from outside the US.
Apple can leverage US laws like the Defend Trade Secrets Act and the Computer Fraud And Abuse Act because the alleged events took place in California.

Prosser’s Revelation of the Lawsuit:

* Prosser states he only found out about the lawsuit by reading a MacRumors article.

In essence, the article presents a conflict between Apple’s official account of a leak and the leaker’s denial of key aspects of that account, while also detailing the consequences for an employee caught in the middle.