Summary of the Article: Artificial Badminton – A Potential Game Changer
This article discusses the emergence and testing of artificial badminton balls, specifically VictorS “New Carbon Sound” series, and their potential impact on the sport. Here’s a breakdown of the key points:
Key Benefits & Features:
* Cost-Effective: Significantly reduces costs compared to natural feather badminton balls, with some users reporting a lifespan three times longer. This has earned it the nickname “food ball” due to its durability and affordability.
* Durability: The carbon fiber composite shaft and reinforced ball head make it exceptionally durable, capable of withstanding multiple games even with some damage to the “wool” (skirt). It performs consistently well in varying climates.
* Playing Feel: Players report the feel is very close to natural badminton balls, though the hitting sound is slightly different. Extensive testing and design adjustments have focused on replicating the natural ball’s feel.
* Material innovation: Uses a combination of carbon fiber composite material for the shaft and LDPE low-density polyethylene for the skirt – a breakthrough in badminton materials.
Testing & Reception:
* Accomplished Trial at U15 Competition: Used in an international professional competition (U15 group) where a single artificial shuttlecock lasted an entire game.
* Positive professional Feedback: Players like Zheng Siwei and Huang Yaqiong (the “IELTS combination”) were surprised by how close the feel was to natural balls. Young players generally found them comparable, aside from the sound.
* amateur Concerns: Some amateurs noted differences in hitting sound and potential psychological impact. Professionals identified issues with line deviation, slower rotation on off-center hits, and potential safety hazards from the sharp carbon fiber rod.
Overall Assessment:
* Not a Replacement, but a substitute: The article emphasizes that artificial badminton isn’t aiming to replace natural balls, but to provide a functional choice for specific scenarios.
* ideal Use Cases: Cost-effective training, high-frequency play, and areas with variable climates.
* Future Development Needed: Continued improvements are needed in hitting feedback accuracy and safety design to overcome consumer barriers and gain wider acceptance.
In essence, the article presents artificial badminton as a promising development with the potential to make the sport more accessible and affordable, while acknowledging that further refinement is necessary to fully address the concerns of high-level players.
