A breach

According to the decision, Zheng and Zeng lived in the same triple courtyard. As a result of the report Ms. Zheng lost a lot of money and a fine of more than 70,000 yuan was spent in half a month.

To fight back, Ms. Zheng, not older, also used the surveillance footage to accuse Mr. Zeng of harassing her neighbors late at night early in the morning, when she and her family were sleeping, Mr. Zeng’s minivan would be The alarm sounds again and has a big impact on the quality of their sleep.

Although she called the police many times for help, Zeng Nan seemed to be deliberately avoiding it. As soon as the police car entered the alley, it stopped bothering the police. after being seen through the surveillance camera of an old car the next day. As a result, Ms. Zheng was often woken up and became very anxious. Not only did she often suffer from insomnia, but she also fell from a height due to lack of energy at work “The Zeng Nan’s face asked her not to change her behavior, so she had no other choice but to go to law, demanding compensation of 300,000 yuan from Zeng Nan for the mental damage she suffered.

Zeng Nan maintained that his minivan did not make any noise, and argued that reasonable volume control standards should be used as a basis for judgment, rather than simply based on the plaintiff’s subjective feelings. The doctor’s diagnosis in the diagnosis certificate only mentioned that the plaintiff was suffering from insomnia and other symptoms as a result of the neighbor’s interference and conflict, and did not clearly indicate the causal relationship with the The so-called “hearsay” statement of the complainant is only a personal opinion and does not contain specific evidence.

The judge found that the accused’s house was next to the complainant’s house and the car alarm was making a noise often late at night, so the accused could not to be ignorant of. The defendant’s failure to take active steps to improve the situation was intentional or negligent. According to the medical certificate attached by the plaintiff, although the defendant argues that there is no causal relationship between the two, since the defendant’s vehicles have disturbed the neighbors late on the night for a long time, causing a severe deterioration in the plaintiff’s sleep. quality, which inevitably leads to long-term depression and affects normal life and work. After extensive consideration of the status, economic status and level of bankruptcy of the two parties, the plaintiff’s request for moral comfort of RMB 300,000 was too high, so the decision was that RMB 50,000 should be compensated.