This is a compilation of text extracted from multiple sources, seemingly related to Bill Gates’ visit to South Korea ⁤and discussions around​ foreign ​aid. Here’s a ‍breakdown of the key ‍points:

Call for Increased ODA: Bill Gates urged South Korea to increase its Official⁣ Development Assistance (ODA)⁣ spending,aiming for 0.5% of GNI,and​ eventually 0.7% as a ‍long-term goal. Currently, it’s below 0.3%. [[1]]
Focus on Multilateral Initiatives: Gates recommended ‌that 15% of South Korea’s aid portfolio‌ be directed towards multilateral initiatives like Gavi,the vaccine alliance,citing their‍ efficiency and accountability.[[1]]
Review ​of ODA Programs: President Lee​ Jae Myung ordered⁢ a review of South Korea’s ODA programs to ensure effectiveness and‌ alignment with​ national ⁤interests. [[1]]
Shift from Bilateral to Multilateral Aid: South Korea’s⁣ ODA is currently heavily focused on bilateral aid, unlike many other donor ‍countries. Gates suggested a shift towards multilateral channels. [[1]]
* Aid⁣ as a Reflection of Values: Gates‍ emphasized that foreign aid should be seen ‌as a⁣ reflection of a nation’s values, noting that⁤ South Korea itself benefited from international aid in the past. [[1]]

reclaiming Narratives: An Exhibition Confronts IndonesiaS Colonial Past and Charts a Path to Inclusion

An exhibition currently on display is powerfully confronting Indonesia‘s complex history with its Chinese-Indonesian population and the lasting impact of Dutch colonialism. Through diverse artistic mediums, the show aims to challenge dominant narratives, acknowledge past injustices, and foster a more inclusive future.

The exhibition directly addresses the historical marginalization of Chinese-Indonesians. Artist Eldwin emphasizes their integral role in Indonesian society, stating simply, “Chinese-Indonesians are also part of Indonesia.” This sentiment resonates throughout the show, which seeks to dismantle the deliberately constructed “otherness” imposed during the colonial era. As visitor abimanyu notes, the Dutch strategically assigned Chinese-indonesians unpopular roles like tax collection and opium trading, effectively diverting public anger away from the colonial rulers themselves.

The trauma of the 1998 riots, targeting Chinese-Indonesians, is a central theme. Dita Gambiro’s installations – miniature shop-houses constructed with materials like plywood and iron wire – starkly depict the architecture of fear that emerged in the aftermath. Heavily barred and fortified, these structures reflect the lasting sense of vulnerability experienced by the community. Gambiro’s charcoal drawing further explores the isolating experience of living behind these barriers, a sentiment echoed by assistant curator Sukiato, who grew up in a similar shop-house in Pekanbaru. He recounts the painful reality of families trapped and lost in fires due to these very security measures, highlighting that the threat of violence remains a present concern.

The exhibition doesn’t shy away from examining how history is written. Maharani Mancanagara’s “Allegory of Cornucopia” offers a counterpoint to conventional European bas-reliefs that glorify war and conquest, instead celebrating natural abundance and everyday life, drawing inspiration from Indonesia’s own sculptural traditions. Sukiato points out this is about reclaiming the power to define heroism.

Ultimately, the exhibition looks towards healing and a more hopeful future. Arahmaiani’s “The Flag Project,” featuring 25 flags embroidered with values like “Community,” “Love,” and “Justice” in various languages, embodies this spirit. Originating after a devastating earthquake in Yogyakarta,the project has evolved into a global collaboration,emphasizing the importance of “local wisdom” – values that predate colonialism – as a foundation for reconciliation.

The exhibition’s impact extends beyond the art world. Rahardjo Djali, the Sultan of the Kasepuhan Palace in Cirebon, praised the show as “inspirational,” acknowledging the dual legacy of Dutch rule – beauty alongside pain. He even referenced the complex history within his own palace,including the controversial reign of a Dutch descendant as Sultan. However, he ultimately advocates for moving forward, stating, “It is now time to live in peace and harmony with everyone.”

This exhibition is not about dwelling on resentment, but about remembering, understanding, and ultimately, building a more inclusive and equitable Indonesia.

Here’s a breakdown of the key points from the provided article:

China’s Stance on AI Progress:

Balancing Development and Security: premier Li Qiang emphasized that AI development must be carefully considered alongside its security risks. He called for urgent global consensus on this balance. Need for Governance and Open-Source: Li advocated for strong governance and the promotion of open-source AI development.
International Cooperation Body: China announced the establishment of a Chinese-led body for international AI cooperation, aiming for extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits.
Sharing Advances: China expressed willingness to share AI advancements with other countries, especially developing ones, to prevent technological monopolies.
Addressing Bottlenecks: Li identified “insufficient supply of computing power and chips” as a meaningful obstacle to AI progress in China.
Technological Self-Reliance: AI is a core component of China’s strategy for technological self-reliance.

Contrast with US Approach:

Low-Regulation Strategy: The article contrasts Li’s remarks with US President Donald Trump’s recent declaration of an aggressive, low-regulation strategy to boost US AI dominance. Trump aims to “remove red tape and onerous regulation.”
US Chip Export Restrictions: Washington has been restricting the export of advanced chips to China, citing concerns about thier use in military systems and the erosion of US tech dominance.

Global Concerns and Perspectives:

Misinformation, Employment, Control: The article highlights broad concerns about AI’s impact, including the spread of misinformation, job displacement, and the potential loss of technological control.
Geoffrey Hinton’s analogy: Nobel laureate Geoffrey Hinton compared AI development to keeping a “cute tiger cub,” stressing the need to train it to prevent harm as it grows.
UN and French Envoy’s Views: UN Secretary-General Antonio guterres called AI governance a “defining test of international cooperation.” France’s AI envoy stressed the urgent need for global action and a leading role for the UN, advocating for an open, transparent, and effective framework.

US-China Rivalry: AI is at the forefront of the rivalry between the US and China.
* Emerging global divisions: an attendee, George Chen, suggested the world is divided into at least three camps: the US and its allies, China and its partners, and the EU, which favors legislative regulation.

Key Takeaways:

The article highlights a critical juncture in AI development, characterized by a growing global awareness of its risks and a divergence in approaches between major powers like China and the US. While China is pushing for international cooperation and open-source development with a focus on governance, the US is pursuing a more deregulated path to maintain its technological edge. The international community, including the UN, is calling for a coordinated global response to manage the complex challenges posed by AI.

Young South Koreans Flock too Risky Real Estate Investments as Hope Dims for Traditional Wealth Building

Seoul,South Korea – A growing wave of young South Koreans,disillusioned with the prospect of building wealth through traditional salary-based savings,are aggressively turning to real estate investment,even employing unconventional strategies like “gap investment” [[3]]. Driven by soaring property prices adn stagnant wages,many in their 20s and 30s feel traditional paths to homeownership are unattainable,forcing them to seek choice routes to financial security.

The trend is fueled by a unique Korean lease system called “jeonse,” where tenants pay a large lump-sum deposit instead of monthly rent. This allows investors to purchase properties by covering only the “gap” between