Steelers Co-Owner Robert Citrone Denied Gag Order in Child Support Case
Court Denies Gag Order Request in Citrone Child Support Case
A Pennsylvania judge has denied an emergency motion filed by Pittsburgh Steelers co-owner Robert Citrone to prevent Amy Blunt from publicly discussing their ongoing child support litigation. The court ruled that no gag order currently prevents either party from speaking about the case, provided they do not disclose sealed court filings to third parties.
Boundaries of Public Disclosure
The decision, reported by TMZ, clarifies the boundaries of communication for both parties involved in the legal dispute. While the court denied Citrone’s request for an emergency order to silence Blunt, the presiding judge explicitly reminded the litigants that the case itself remains sealed. Under this mandate, neither Citrone nor Blunt may share specific court filings with individuals or entities not directly engaged in the litigation.
Citrone’s legal team had sought to block Blunt from discussing the case with journalists, newspapers, or on social media platforms. The motion was prompted by concerns over Blunt’s online activity, which included allegations regarding Citrone’s wealth and the medical needs of their three-year-old son, Luca. Citrone’s attorneys argued these posts violated previous court directives, while Blunt maintained that a gag order would infringe upon her First Amendment rights.
Blunt Seeks Citrone Financial Records for Child Support
The underlying legal conflict centers on a child support case in which Blunt is seeking access to Citrone’s financial records. Blunt has requested access to tax returns and income statements to establish an appropriate level of support for their child. Her claims suggest that Citrone earned roughly $113 million in taxable income during the 2024 calendar year.
The court has previously granted Blunt’s request to depose Citrone, his wife, Cindy, and his children. These depositions are intended to examine the family’s standard of living and overall lifestyle. The legal proceedings remain ongoing as both parties prepare for further discovery.
Blunt Plans TikTok Account to Detail Allegations
The scope of public commentary remains a point of contention. Blunt has indicated an intent to launch a TikTok account detailing her allegations of infidelity and what she characterizes as a refusal by Citrone to provide adequate support for their son. The current court order allows for continued public discussion of the matter, unless both sides mutually agree to a formal gag order.
Attorneys for Robert Citrone have not yet provided a public response to the denial of the motion. The extent of Citrone’s financial disclosures and the final determination of child support payments remain unresolved.