Home » Sport » Slavia vs. Dukla: Refereeing Controversies & Chorý’s Yellow Cards

Slavia vs. Dukla: Refereeing Controversies & Chorý’s Yellow Cards

by Alex Carter - Sports Editor

Slavia Forward Chorý Should Have been⁢ sent Off, Referee Commission Admits

PRAGUE, September 29, 2025 – Slavia Prague striker Tomáš Chorý (30) was incorrectly allowed to ⁣remain on ‍the field during‌ a league match against Dukla Prague, despite committing two yellow-card ​worthy offenses, the⁤ Commission of Referees‌ announced today ⁣following a review of the‌ match. Chorý scored both goals⁣ in Slavia’s 2-0 victory.

The controversy ‍stems from two incidents involving Chorý ‍and Dukla’s Jaroslav Svozil. The first occurred in the 6th minute, where Svozil alleged unsportsmanlike conduct by⁣ Chorý. Referee Dalibor Černý ‌did not issue a⁣ card,a decision the ⁢commission upheld,stating,”The referee did not misrepresent‌ the yellow ‌card⁢ of the home team’s players No. 25 for the unsportsmanlike behavior towards the‌ opponent.‍ The referee could not see the situation.” Though, the commission criticized ‍the Video​ Assistant ‌Referee (Pavel Orel), noting, “VAR did not correctly‍ interact.”

Later ⁣in the match, in the 24th minute, Chorý stepped on Svozil’s hand ‍while the Dukla player was on the ground. Černý did issue a yellow card, which ‌the commission ⁢deemed correct: “The referee correctly granted the⁤ yellow ‌card ‌of the home team players No. 25⁢ for the unintentional step on⁤ the opponent’s hand.”

Despite the ⁣second yellow card, Chorý was allowed to continue playing and later scored his second goal before ‌halftime. This‌ means he will be eligible to play ‌in​ the upcoming derby against Sparta.

The Commission also reviewed two penalty decisions from​ the match ​between Pilsen and ⁤Zlín (Zlín won 1-0). They ruled⁣ that a penalty awarded to Pilsen​ in the first half, called by Stanislav Volek for a foul by Jakub ⁤Kolář on Rafiu Durosinmi, was correctly ​given, as the Zlín defender‍ “tripped the Pilsen striker ⁢with his left foot.” Durosinmi’s subsequent penalty​ attempt hit ⁤the post.

Volek’s decision not ‌ to award a ⁢second penalty to Pilsen in‍ the 64th minute, following a challenge⁤ on Denis ‌Visinsky by Michal Fukala,⁢ was also deemed correct by the commission, as Fukala’s actions did ⁣not constitute a foul.

The Commission stated that it typically reviews four controversial incidents per round for public comment, but only three⁢ warranted discussion ​from the⁢ weekend’s matches, with other⁣ incidents being evaluated internally.

[Tweet from Football Referee (@FACROZDCE) regarding the Chorý incident – included for context as in original article]

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.