Home » Sport » Shane van Gisbergen’s disruptor-level NASCAR success opens the door to more

Shane van Gisbergen’s disruptor-level NASCAR success opens the door to more

by Alex Carter - Sports Editor

SVG Dominance Reshapes NASCAR Playoff Picture

Rookie’s Road Course Wins Force Strategic Rethink

A seismic shift has occurred in NASCAR’s playoff landscape, courtesy of a sensational rookie. Shane van Gisbergen’s astonishing three road course victories in a single month have not only secured his playoff berth but have also propelled him to third in the playoff standings, challenging the established order and forcing multi-car teams to re-evaluate their strategies.

The “Disruptor” Strikes Again

Trackhouse Racing owner **Justin Marks**, known for his “disruptor” mentality, appears to have once again outmaneuvered the competition. While road course ringers like **AJ Allmendinger** have previously leveraged single wins for playoff entry, van Gisbergen’s consistent dominance on circuits akin to his Australian Supercars background, coupled with the parity of the Next Gen car, presents an unprecedented challenge. His three wins guarantee him a playoff spot, regardless of future format changes.

This trend is not lost on industry insiders. Former driver **Max Papis** commented on X, highlighting the increased relevance of mastering road courses in NASCAR. He noted, This will open (the) door to a variety of racers that might never had a (shot) at it. Historically, NASCAR has adapted to emerging talent pools, from short-track specialists to open-wheel converts and sprint car stars. Now, Supercars drivers are on the radar, although van Gisbergen’s exceptional skill set may be difficult to replicate.

Playoff Bubble Watch

The regular season’s final six races now carry significant playoff implications. Road courses, once considered true wild cards, are increasingly being viewed through the lens of van Gisbergen’s predictable success. His victories have inadvertently benefited drivers like **Michael McDowell** and **Ty Gibbs** by preventing them from being bumped out of playoff contention by new winners.

Currently, **Tyler Reddick** is the only driver comfortably secure in the playoff field based on points. **Chris Buescher**, **Alex Bowman**, and **Bubba Wallace** remain vulnerable, with their playoff statuses potentially shifting with any new winners from outside the top 16.

Here’s a look at the remaining schedule and their upset potential:

  • Daytona (Aug. 23): High likelihood of an upset winner, potentially adding another new playoff contender.
  • Watkins Glen (Aug. 10): Roughly 50-50. If van Gisbergen doesn’t win, it opens opportunities for bubble drivers.
  • Richmond (Aug. 16): Unlikely to produce an upset winner, typically favoring established teams.
  • Iowa (Aug. 3): Low probability of an upset; expect a win from a top-ranked driver.
  • Dover (Sunday): Extremely unlikely, given the track’s history of favoring established competitors.
  • Indianapolis (July 27): Minimal chance of an upset in this prestigious “crown jewel” event.

Realistically, only two more different winners are anticipated, which would solidify **Reddick’s** position and intensify the battle for the final playoff spot between **Buescher**, **Bowman**, and potentially **Wallace**.

Brad Keselowski has voiced concerns about the increasing number of road course events on the NASCAR schedule.

The Case for Fewer Road Courses

A debate is intensifying regarding the number of road courses on the NASCAR calendar. **Brad Keselowski** recently argued that NASCAR was built on oval racing, suggesting that IMSA is better positioned for road course competition. He stated, NASCAR was successfully built as a primarily oval racing series. With the schedule expanding to six road courses, up from a traditional two, some feel it has become excessive, especially with the Next Gen car, which some critics believe doesn’t always provide the most compelling racing on these circuits.

**Keselowski** suggests a sweet spot of “two to four” road courses. This perspective advocates for retaining the traditional Sonoma and Watkins Glen, potentially adding a street race like Chicago and an international event, while perhaps removing tracks like the Roval and Circuit of the Americas. This approach aims to cater to the core fanbase, who are primarily oval enthusiasts.

Charter Status Under Legal Cloud

In parallel legal battles, 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports continue their lawsuit against NASCAR, alleging monopolistic practices. Their recent plea for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order aims to preserve their charter status for the upcoming Dover race. NASCAR’s response is due soon, with a potential ruling before the Dover weekend.

The situation is further complicated by NASCAR’s indication of potentially reassigning or selling the charters, putting the teams’ futures at risk. Without their charter status, teams like **23XI Racing** and **Front Row Motorsports** face significant financial hurdles and the possibility of ceasing operations. This uncertainty also impacts drivers, such as **Tyler Reddick**, whose contract may allow him to become a free agent if his team loses its charter.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.