Home » Technology » Science and Pseudo-Sciences Review N ° 354 (October 2025)

Science and Pseudo-Sciences Review N ° 354 (October 2025)

Science & Pseudo-Sciences Review N° 354⁣ Spotlights Critical Thinking in a ‌Disinformation Age

The October ⁣2025 issue ⁤of Science & pseudo-Sciences Review, published by AFIS⁤ Science, arrives at⁤ a pivotal moment – as public ‌trust in institutions and‌ expertise faces unprecedented challenges. ​This edition focuses on the ‍crucial intersection of science and‌ decision-making, offering tools and analysis to navigate ‌an‌ increasingly complex information landscape. From evaluating political choices informed by ​science to⁤ dissecting the allure of ‌alternative medicine,the latest issue provides a robust defense against misinformation and a call for evidence-based reasoning.

The ‌354th edition delves into pressing issues,​ including a critical ‌look at permaculture, the science ⁣behind sex determination, and healthdisparities between the US and ⁤Europe. A dedicated section, ‍coordinated by Martin Brunschwig, examines critical thinking skills, particularly for young people in disadvantaged⁣ neighborhoods, and spotlights resources like YouTube‍ channels dedicated to explaining critical mindsets. With ‍the rise of easily accessible but ofen unreliable information, the review’s ​emphasis on ‍scientific integrity and media collaboration is more ⁣vital than ever.

Highlights from Science & Pseudo-Sciences‍ Review N° 354:

Decisions Informed by ​Science: features an article, “Political decisions informed by ⁣science,” by David Skley, and addresses the DUPLOMB law with a press release from AFIS.
Articles: Stéphane ‍Varaire ⁢questions​ whether permaculture‌ is ‍a solution‍ or illusion.
Chronic: Explores alternative medicine (“Can we really ‘cut the fire’?” by Valentin Ruggeri), science and⁤ media collaboration (Hervé Maisonneuve), Diogenes⁣ syndrome and ⁤hoarding (David Masson), and bilingualism (Brigitte Axelrad).
Critical Thinking: Alice⁤ Bougnères ⁢investigates information education for disadvantaged youth, ⁤Isabelle‍ Dore reviews ⁢critical thinking YouTube channels (“Info or mytho? Explain critical mind to teens”), Romain ⁣Meunier presents “Evidence-Based Good humor” (“Repressed”), ⁢Brigitte Axelrad examines false memories, ‌and highlights the popular university‌ of rationality and critical mind.
Assumes ​on Science: Christophe de ⁣la Roche Saint-André discusses genetic⁢ control of sex ‍determination, and Alexandre relative analyzes health and mortality differences between the‍ US and​ Europe.
AFIS ​Life: Includes an⁢ article available‌ online.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.