Philippines-China Studies Center Launches, Faces Questions of Influence
The newly established Philippines-China Studies Center is opening its doors amid scrutiny regarding its connections to individuals and groups with close ties to the Chinese Embassy. The center, housed within Diliman College, aims to foster dialogue and contribute to the peaceful resolution of disputes between Manila and Beijing, but analysts are raising concerns about potential influence.
Among the founders of Diliman College is Ms.alice Coseteng, daughter of Mr. Coseteng and mother to Ms. Coseteng. At the center’s launch event,Ms. Coseteng expressed a view that the South China Sea should serve as “a bridge” rather than a barrier between the Philippines and China – a sentiment echoing the “friendship-diplomacy” promoted by local civic groups known to be close to the Chinese Embassy. Leaders from these groups were also in attendance at the launch.
While acknowledging these associations do not definitively prove Chinese government influence, analysts Dr. arugay and Dr. Koh suggest they shape public perception of the center.
Dr. Banlaoi, who leads the center, stated it will be funded through Diliman College and will not accept direct financial support from either the Chinese or Philippine governments, believing such funding would “give political colour.” He indicated that visiting Chinese scholars and their affiliated organizations will cover portions of their travel and hosting expenses. Dr. banlaoi also plans to explore potential funding opportunities from Chinese-Filipino associations in the future.
However, Dr. Koh cautioned that influence operations frequently utilize indirect funding channels instead of overt state support, highlighting “the issue about funding from indirect sources.” Dr. Arugay further emphasized the vulnerability of academic institutions in the Philippines, noting the absence of a foreign-interference law.
“One must always bear in mind that china’s aggression is constant. You can’t blame some academics for approaching China with severe distrust, even cynicism,” Dr. Arugay said.
Dr. Banlaoi refuted any suggestion that the center operates as part of a covert pattern, reiterating its core objective: “We wont to contribute to the peaceful settlement of our disputes. We want our centre to have a role in rebuilding confidence between the two governments.”
The center’s success, however, may be challenged by the existing tensions in the South China Sea, making trust a scarce resource as it attempts to build academic bridges between the two nations.
(Additional reporting by Michelle Ng)
