The Illusion of Prevention: How Market Forces Undermine Health
The assertion that the market is the foundation of social relations holds a chilling truth when applied to healthcare. We are consistently presented with a false dichotomy – healing versus prevention – a framing that obscures the essential problem: the commodification of health itself.This rhetoric, prioritizing profit over well-being, ensures that genuine health crises remain perpetually unresolved.
The COVID-19 pandemic offered a stark lesson in this dynamic. The massive, globally-implemented preventative measure of vaccination, rather than solving the problem, simply shifted it, potentially creating new and equally severe threats to human survival. The immense profits reaped by companies like Pfizer during this period raise serious questions, and recent revelations are deeply troubling.
A lawsuit spearheaded by lawyer Aaron Siri forced the release of over 450,000 Pfizer documents held by the FDA. Analysis by a team of 3,500 professionals – doctors and lawyers alike – has yielded over 100 reports detailing a disturbing pattern. within the first seven months of vaccination rollout, serious adverse reactions were 20 times higher, and deaths 23 times higher, than all other vaccines combined over a 30-year period.
These findings weren’t simply accidental. The documentation reveals conversations involving up to 15 White House officials – politicians and health professionals – actively engaged in a cover-up. this points to a disturbing complicity between private enterprise and those entrusted with public health, a situation where the interests of “100% private companies” demonstrably outweigh the well-being of the population.
The reported side effects are significant. While myalgia (muscle pain) and joint pain were common, more serious issues emerged, including liver damage, stroke, and tragically, death – all occurring within 48 hours of injection, and known to Pfizer.furthermore, the vaccine was linked to heart damage (myocarditis and pericarditis), aortic problems, and a range of blood disorders including thrombosis and blood clots. The irony is notably poignant in cases like that of a Panamanian doctor on the national vaccination commission who himself suffered thrombotic damage, a devastating consequence of promoting the very intervention that nearly cost him his health.
Perhaps most perplexing is the lack of focus on respiratory effects within the Pfizer documentation. Given that COVID-19 was presented as a respiratory illness, one would expect extensive research on lung function, oxygen levels, and mucous membranes. the scarcity of such data, as highlighted by Naomi Wolf, raises serious questions about the true understanding – and perhaps the deliberate misdirection – surrounding the disease.
This accumulating evidence reinforces a critical point: true prevention is impossible when health is treated as a commodity subject to “market laws.” The pharmaceutical-financial-industrial complex dictates the rules, prioritizing private profit over genuine solutions. The “Telexpertos” – those who champion convenient narratives – conveniently ignore the scale of PfizerS potential fraud and the systemic issues it exposes.
this isn’t simply about questioning a single vaccine; it’s about recognizing the inherent conflict of interest when profit motives drive healthcare decisions. Until we fundamentally shift our approach, prioritizing public health over private gain, we are destined to repeat this cycle of manufactured crises and inadequate, profit-driven “solutions.”
