Olympia Considers AI-Driven Priority-Based Budgeting for Strategic Resource Allocation
Table of Contents
Olympia, Washington, is exploring the use of artificial intelligence to revolutionize its budget process, shifting from traditional departmental allocations to a system focused on program and service prioritization. The initiative,known as priority-based budgeting,aims to enhance transparency and ensure resources are aligned with the city’s core objectives.
A New Approach to city Finances
Assistant City Manager Debbie Sullivan presented the concept to the Finance Committee on August 18, emphasizing its potential to clearly articulate the value of city services. “it helps us tell the story of what we do, why we do it, and how much it costs to do that,” Sullivan stated. “It also provides a framework for decision makers to evaluate how we use those resources to explore new revenue, cost saving measures and those types of things.”
The city contracted with Tyler Technologies to analyze its budget data. This involved scoring and peer-reviewing various data points, then categorizing programs and services based on their impact, reliance, alignment with mandates, and associated costs.The total investment in the software and consulting services reached $134,750.
Did You Know? Priority-based budgeting isn’t new, but the integration of AI to analyze complex budgetary data represents a meaningful advancement in local government financial management.
AI-Generated Insights and Recommendations
Following a June retreat were department directors began inputting 2026 budget information, Tyler Technologies leveraged AI to generate a draft report. This report offers recommendations for cost reduction and revenue generation, drawing on case studies from comparable municipalities. Importantly,the AI system does not suggest tax increases as a revenue solution.
Recognizing the potential for inaccuracies inherent in AI-generated content, Sullivan stressed the importance of thorough review.”Because the report is AI generated, it’s the city’s due diligence to review the entire 300-page report for errors and false perceptions,” she explained, adding that this review is already underway.
Categorizing Programs and Services
The AI system categorized programs and services into sixteen groups based on their impact, cost, mandate, and reliance. This analysis revealed that over $27 million is currently invested in programs deemed to have low impact, high cost, low mandate, and low reliance. Conversely, twenty programs identified as high impact, low cost, and mandated receive over $5 million in funding, with the AI suggesting exploration of cost recovery or grant funding opportunities.
The largest investment-over $93 million-is allocated to twenty-nine programs categorized as “unique core” programming, characterized by high impact, high cost, and strong mandates and reliance.
| Category | Investment | AI Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Low Impact, High Cost | $27 Million+ | Review for potential reduction or elimination |
| High Impact, Low Cost | $5 Million+ | Explore cost recovery/grant funding |
| High Impact, High Cost | $93 Million+ | Maintain as “unique core” programming |
Pro Tip: Understanding the categorization criteria-impact, cost, mandate, and reliance-is crucial for interpreting the AI’s recommendations and making informed budgetary decisions.
Next Steps and Community Engagement
A workshop for department heads is scheduled for august 26 to discuss the AI’s suggestions and previously implemented cost-saving measures. City Manager Jay Burney highlighted the success of private sponsorships in supporting events like Oly on Ice, demonstrating a proactive approach to revenue generation. The AI system identified potential savings ranging from $19.4 million to $28.4 million.
Burney acknowledged that some AI recommendations may be infeasible due to state laws and emphasized the need for careful consideration. Sullivan added that the city will also re-evaluate the weighting criteria used by the AI, possibly leading to adjustments in the data.
Following the department head workshop, staff will present further results to the finance Committee, followed by a council study session and broader public communication regarding future budget plans.What impact do you think AI will have on local government budgeting in the coming years? How can cities ensure transparency and accountability when using AI in financial decision-making?
The adoption of AI in public sector budgeting reflects a broader trend toward data-driven decision-making in government. According to a report by deloitte, “AI-powered budgeting can help governments move from reactive to proactive financial management” [[1]]. This shift is driven by the increasing availability of data and the need for greater efficiency and accountability in public spending. The use of AI also aligns with principles of performance-based budgeting, which emphasizes linking funding to measurable outcomes.
Frequently Asked Questions about AI and City Budgeting
- What is priority-based budgeting? It’s a method of allocating resources based on the impact and importance of programs and services.
- How is AI being used in this process? AI analyzes budget data to identify potential cost savings and revenue opportunities.
- Is the AI’s advice automatically implemented? No, the city is carefully reviewing all recommendations for feasibility and accuracy.
- What is the cost of implementing this AI system? The city invested $134,750 in the software and consulting services.
- Will this lead to tax increases? The AI system does not recommend tax increases.
we’re excited to see how this innovative approach shapes Olympia’s future. Share your thoughts in the comments below, and don’t forget to subscribe for more updates on local government and technology!
