Home » World » Mortgage Fraud: Incentives, Tax Benefits & Detection

Mortgage Fraud: Incentives, Tax Benefits & Detection

by Priya Shah – Business Editor

trump ‌Accuses Fed’s ⁣Lisa Cook of Mortgage ‍Fraud, But ⁤Proving Intent Is a ⁤High Bar

WASHINGTON ⁤- Former President Donald Trump⁢ has⁢ accused Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook of mortgage fraud, allegations that highlight the difficulty of prosecuting such cases even when discrepancies exist in property ownership ⁢records. ​The ‍accusations centre‌ on ‍Cook’s designation of a property as ‌her primary residence.

According to public records, cook listed a ‍property⁣ in Ann Arbor, Michigan, as ⁤her primary residence ⁢while concurrently holding‍ a mortgage on a separate property in Washington, D.C. This raised questions about whether⁤ she misrepresented ‌her⁣ primary residence to secure a more favorable ​mortgage rate. ‌Typically, a primary residence is defined as the place where an⁢ owner⁤ spends⁣ most of their‌ time,‍ votes,‍ files tax returns, and receives mail, explained mortgage fraud ⁢expert Campo.

A 2023 report by the ‌Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia ⁢identified over 22,000 instances of⁤ “fraudulent borrowers” ‍misrepresenting owner-occupancy status between 2005 and 2017,⁢ based on⁣ a sample of over⁤ 15 million loans. The report found these borrowers ⁤tended to take out larger loans and had higher mortgage default rates.⁢ However, the authors ⁣noted⁣ that such fraud is often “difficult to detect until long after the mortgage has been originated.”

“There is a difference between the⁢ court of law and the court of​ public opinion,” said Jonathan edges,a law ​professor at Washington University in‍ St. Louis and former‌ Assistant Attorney General, in a⁣ recent CNBC interview. “In the court of law, this is small ball ⁣and very difficult to prove.” ⁣He‌ elaborated that prosecutors ‍would need to⁢ demonstrate not onyl an inaccurate ⁤form submission but also “the specific⁢ intent ​to deceive, to​ defraud banks, as​ opposed to just making‍ a​ mistake.”

Federal sentencing ​data⁤ shows ‍38 mortgage fraud ⁣offenders⁤ were ⁢sentenced⁣ in ⁣fiscal year 2024, a⁤ slight increase from 34 in ⁤2023, but considerably ⁢down from 426 in 2015. The U.S. Sentencing commission data⁤ does not categorize the‍ specific types of mortgage⁤ fraud.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.