Home » Health » Low Risk of Second Tumor After Early Breast Cancer – Oxford Study

Low Risk of Second Tumor After Early Breast Cancer – Oxford Study

Low‌ Risk of second ​Cancer Following ⁤Breast Cancer ⁤Treatment

A recent study reveals that while women diagnosed with breast ⁣cancer ‌do face⁤ a slightly elevated risk of ‌developing a second cancer, the overall risk remains relatively ⁢low and is often outweighed by the benefits ‍of treatment. The⁢ research,focusing on long-term outcomes,found ‍that approximately 13.6% of women developed a non-breast ​cancer ‍- specifically of the uterus, lung, ⁢or intestine‍ – following a ⁤breast cancer diagnosis. This represents⁢ a 2.1% increase compared ⁤to the​ general ‌population. Additionally, 5.6% developed contralateral‌ breast cancer (cancer in the other breast),a⁤ 3.1% higher ⁢rate than expected in‌ the broader population.

The study highlighted that the most ‌common secondary⁤ tumors were located in the uterus,lung,and intestine. Researchers⁣ observed that the increased risk of a second breast‌ cancer didn’t significantly vary based on age at initial ⁣diagnosis, but ⁢the ‍risk of⁣ contralateral breast cancer was notably ​higher in younger women.

Specifically, a woman diagnosed with breast cancer at age 60 has an estimated 17% risk of developing a non-breast cancer and a 5% risk of contralateral breast cancer ​by ​age 80, compared to 15% and ‌3% ⁣respectively ⁤for women ‍in the general population. For a woman diagnosed at age 40, the estimated risks at age 60 are 6% ⁣for both non-breast and ⁤contralateral breast cancer, compared to 4% and ⁢2% ⁢for​ the general population.

The research also investigated⁤ the impact of ‌treatments. ⁤radiotherapy was linked to increased ​rates ​of contralateral breast and lung cancer, endocrine therapy⁤ was ⁤associated with uterus‍ cancer ‍(but also a reduction in contralateral breast cancer), and chemotherapy was⁣ linked⁣ to‌ acute leukemia. Researchers estimate that approximately 7% of the excess ‍second cancers ⁣ could be attributed to these adjuvant therapies. However,they emphasized that this “little risk” is consistently outweighed ⁢by ⁤the notable⁢ benefits​ of these ⁤treatments when recommended.The authors stressed the importance‌ of transparent communication, stating, “Risk information should be easily available. [It] ​ helps plan our lives‌ and to think about ‍the future.” They also acknowledged potential limitations ‌in their findings, including incomplete cancer registry data and a ⁣lack of ⁢information regarding family history, genetic⁣ predisposition, and ​lifestyle factors like smoking.The findings have been echoed by Self-reliant ⁤voice,a UK-based institution representing cancer patients,who published​ an ⁣opinion ‌piece emphasizing the ‌need to share this “reassuringinformation. ⁢They noted that “Many patients with breast cancer ⁤believe that their ‍risks of a⁢ second cancer are much greater ⁢than they really are” and that the study’s‌ results, demonstrating a low risk, should be widely disseminated ⁣to alleviate patient anxieties.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.