SEOUL – May 17,2024 –
The ongoing debate surrounding construction site safety has intensified in south korea amidst the presidential race. The Great Disaster Punishment Act, designed to mitigate construction accidents, has been a focal point as candidates take differing stances. The Act’s effectiveness is questioned despite its enforcement,wiht presidential hopefuls like Kim Moon-soo expressing intent to revise the law. The situation underscores the necessity of preventative measures. For more on the divergent views of the candidates, read on.
Construction Site Safety Debate Intensifies Amidst Presidential Race
The Great Disaster Punishment Act,aimed at reducing construction site accidents,remains a contentious issue in South Korean politics. Despite its enforcement, the number of incidents at construction sites has not decreased, sparking debate among presidential candidates.
Accident Statistics: A Mixed Bag
Data from the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport reveals a complex picture of construction site safety. Last year, the top 20 construction companies reported a total of 1,868 casualties. This figure includes injuries requiring more than three days of treatment and property damage incidents exceeding ₩10 million, as recorded in the Government Construction Corporation’s Extensive Information Network (CSI).
- Overall casualties decreased by 17.3% from the previous year (2,259).
- However,casualties increased by 12.1% compared to 2022 (1,666).
- The number of deaths rose to 35,a 25.0% increase from the previous year (25).
- Injuries decreased to 1,833, down 17.8% from the previous year (2,231).
Did You Know?
The Great Disaster Punishment Act was introduced to hold companies accountable for safety lapses leading to serious accidents. It aims to prevent future incidents by imposing stricter penalties on employers and corporations.
presidential Candidates’ Divergent Views
Presidential candidates hold differing opinions on the effectiveness and future of the Great Disaster Punishment Act,fueling further controversy.
Kim Moon-soo’s Stance
Kim Moon-soo, a presidential candidate, has been critical of the Act. Regarding a death accident at the SPC Samlip Sihwa Plant, Kim stated on May 21st:
“We know that the death of the employer does not disappear.”
Kim Moon-soo, presidential Candidate
Kim also expressed his intention to revise the law, stating on May 15th at a lecture at the Yeouido small and Medium Business Association:
“When I become a decision -making, I will fix this evil law from harassing you anymore.”
Kim Moon-soo,Presidential Candidate
Lee Jae-myung’s Counterpoint
In contrast,Lee Jae-myung,a Democratic Party candidate,questioned the characterization of the Act as “evil.” He argued:
“Can we agree together and claim to be evil law? If some of the employers are abolished, they will be cozy.”
Lee Jae-myung, Democratic Party Candidate
Pro Tip: Understanding the Debate
The core of the debate revolves around whether the focus should be on punishment or prevention. Some argue that strict penalties are necessary to deter negligence, while others believe that investing in safety measures and training is more effective in the long run.
Industry Calls for Prevention
Industry stakeholders are urging presidential candidates to prioritize preventative measures over punitive actions. Kim Jung-gon, chairman of the Policy Committee at the Citizens’ Citizens’ Urban Reform Center, emphasized the need for a comprehensive approach:
“We must revise the Middle Business Act as a serious disaster prevention law and add detailed work regulations related to preventing critical citizens’ disasters. the Ministry of Public administration and Security should improve the general adjustment function for safety.”
Kim Jung-gon, Chairman of the Policy Committee, Citizens’ Citizens’ Urban Reform Center
