Okay, here’s a breakdown of the key points from the provided text, focusing on the criticisms and accusations made by Josep Borrell, the former head of EU diplomacy:
Core accusations & Criticisms:
Famine in Gaza: Borrell states that famine is officially present in the Gaza Governorate (central/northern Gaza), and directly blames Israel for this, despite Israeli denials.
International Inaction: He strongly criticizes the international community’s lack of response to the situation, stating it’s a “mute attack.” He acknowledges Spain has been vocal but feels it’s been insufficient.
EU commission President (Von der Leyen) Criticism: Borrell is highly critical of Ursula von der Leyen, accusing her of silence and inaction, attributing it to her German nationality and perceived alignment with the German government’s stance on Israel. He says he’s “not surprised, but outraged.”
Misuse of “Anti-Semitism” Accusation: He condemns Israel’s practice of labeling any criticism of its actions as “anti-Semitic” and rejects the use of this term to deflect from the situation in Gaza.
Double Standards in International Law: Borrell argues that if any other country behaved as the Netanyahu government is in Palestine, its association agreement with the EU would have been suspended. He notes the EU has only proposed partial suspension of Israel’s participation in a scientific research program.
Loss of european Values: He believes Europe has lost its “soul” – its ability to represent the values it proclaims.
UN Security Council Ineffectiveness: He points to the US vetoes of resolutions related to Gaza as evidence of the UN Security Council’s inability to act, regardless of whether the US president is Trump or Biden.
Disrespect for the UN: He condemns Israel’s treatment of UN organizations and officials (Guterres being considered “persona non grata”) and the impunity with which Israeli officials allegedly disrespect UN rules within the UN headquarters.
Distinction between Holocaust & Netanyahu’s Government: Borrell makes a controversial statement,differentiating between the historical tragedy of the Holocaust and the actions of Netanyahu’s current government,suggesting some countries are hampered by a “mental block” related to the Holocaust.
key Themes:
Strong condemnation of Israel’s actions in Gaza.
Frustration with the lack of a strong EU response.
Criticism of the US role in blocking international action.
* Concern about the erosion of international law and European values.
In essence, Borrell delivers a scathing critique of Israel’s conduct, the international community’s response (or lack thereof), and the perceived failings of the European Union in upholding its values and enforcing international law.
Let me know if you’d like me to elaborate on any specific point or aspect of the text.
