“`html
Singapore Court Hears Defense in Pro-Palestinian Procession Trial
Table of Contents
women in Singapore accused of organizing a pro-Palestinian procession. Defense argues similar events went unprosecuted.">
SINGAPORE – The trial of three women accused of organizing a pro-Palestinian procession towards the Istana in February 2024 commenced on Tuesday, with their defense team highlighting previous similar events that did not result in prosecution. The case raises questions about freedom of expression and the application of public order laws in Singapore.
The Charges
Siti Amirah Mohamed Asrori, 30, Mossammad Sobikun Nahar, 26, and Annamalai Kokila Parvathi, 36, all Singaporean citizens, are jointly contesting a single charge each under the Public Order Act for organizing a procession that took place between 2 p.m. and 3 p.m. on February 2, 2024, along the perimeter of the Istana, a designated prohibited area [1].
Did You Know? The Istana is not only the official residence and office of the President of singapore but also houses the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO).
Defense Argues Lack of Awareness
Uthayasurian Sidambaram, the lawyer representing the three women, informed the court that his clients were unaware that using the specified route to deliver letters to the PMO, located within the Istana grounds, was prohibited. He based this argument on a prior, smaller-scale event weeks before the alleged offense where a group delivered letters related to the Palestinian cause to the PMO without facing any legal repercussions [1].
Inquiry Officer’s Testimony
Investigation officer Muhammad Faizal,the prosecution’s first witness,testified that on February 2,2024,a group of approximately 70 individuals gathered outside Plaza Singapura before proceeding towards the Istana. The group’s intention, according to the defense, was to deliver letters concerning the Palestinian cause to the PMO, utilizing a mail drop-off point at the rear gate of the Istana [1].
CCTV footage presented by the prosecution showed the three women interacting with members of the group outside Plaza Singapura, with two of them distributing umbrellas adorned with watermelon designs. The watermelon, bearing the same colors as the Palestinian flag, has become a symbol of solidarity with Palestine [1].
While the area outside Plaza Singapura was not a prohibited zone, Mr. Faizal noted that areas immediately surrounding the istana, including paths along Buyong road, Cavenagh Road, and the space outside the main gate on Orchard Road, were indeed prohibited [1].
Defense Attempts to Introduce Evidence of Prior Incidents
The defense lawyer attempted to introduce evidence related to five prior incidents where individuals allegedly delivered letters to the Istana without facing legal action. One such incident, on January 11, 2024, involved a group of 17 people hand-delivering letters also concerning the Palestinian cause to the PMO. No action was taken against them, leading the defendants to believe their actions were permissible [1].
Deputy Public Prosecutor Sunil Nair objected to the admission of this evidence,arguing that there was insufficient evidence to make meaningful comparisons and that knowledge of a previous unpunished offense does not constitute a valid defense. Judge Ng sided with the prosecution and rejected the defense’s application [1].
pro Tip: Understanding the nuances of the Public Order Act is crucial for anyone planning a public gathering in Singapore.
Defining a Procession
Mr. Uthayasurian questioned Mr. Faizal on how he concluded that the group constituted a procession. Mr. Faizal stated that the group was proceeding with a cause and displayed common elements visible to the public, such as the watermelon umbrellas. He confirmed that the group did not display placards or shout slogans. He also agreed that all individuals were carrying letters to deliver to the PMO [1].
Mr. Faizal confirmed that no warning was given to anyone in the group that the event required a permit,and that no application for a permit had been submitted [1].
Trial continues
The trial is set to resume on Wednesday, with the prosecution expected to call more witnesses. A conviction for organizing a prohibited procession carries a penalty of up to six months imprisonment, a fine of up to S$10,000 (US$7,900), or both [1].
Singapore Facts
| Fact | Details |
|---|---|
| Location | Tropical island in Southeast asia [1] |
| Area | Approximately 710 square kilometers [1] (increased by land reclamation [3]) |
| Population | Around five million people [1] |
| Major Communities | Chinese, Malay, Indian, and Eurasian [1] |
Evergreen Insights: Public Order and Freedom of Expression
The case highlights the delicate balance between maintaining public order and protecting freedom of expression. Singapore, known for its strict laws and regulations, faces ongoing scrutiny regarding its approach to public assemblies and protests.The Public Order Act,designed to prevent disruptions and ensure public safety,is frequently enough cited in cases involving unauthorized gatherings. However, critics argue that the law can be used to stifle dissent and limit the
