Home » Technology » Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS: Could It Be Alien Technology?

Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS: Could It Be Alien Technology?

by Rachel Kim – Technology Editor

Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS substantially Larger Than Previously Estimated, New‌ Research Suggests

WASHINGTON D.C. -⁤ A newly published analysis indicates that ⁢the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS is substantially larger and more massive than initial estimates suggested, perhaps making it an exceptionally rare visitor to our solar ⁢system. The research, ⁣based on observations from the Hubble Space Telescope, places the object at the “top of the range of current estimates” for its size.

The findings suggest 3I/ATLAS is “three to five orders‍ of‍ magnitude” more massive than previously detected interstellar objects ‘Oumuamua (roughly a quarter mile in length) and 2I/Borisov (0.6 miles in length).

Avi Loeb, a Harvard University astrophysicist, highlights the object’s unusual characteristics. “Given the ⁣limited reservoir of heavy elements,we should ⁢have discovered ‌on the order‍ of a hundred thousand interstellar objects on the 0.1-kilometer scale of 1I/’Oumuamua before finding 3I/ATLAS,yet ⁤we only detected two interstellar objects previously,” he wrote in a recent blog ⁣post.

Adding to⁤ the intrigue, 3I/ATLAS is on a trajectory that will bring it within 1.67 million miles of Mars’ orbit in just over a week, a “remarkable fine-tuning”⁢ according to Loeb.‌ He advocates⁤ for utilizing the HiRISE camera on NASA’s Mars⁤ Reconnaissance ​Orbiter to obtain a more detailed view of the object, potentially confirming its size and composition.

Loeb suggests that if the HiRISE camera determines the object’s core is larger than 3.1 miles, a ⁢natural origin from interstellar rocky​ material would become “untenable.” He poses the question: “Is 3I/ATLAS ‌an ⁢unusually massive comet with an unusual chemical composition on an​ unusually rare trajectory or alien‌ technology?”

Loeb cautions against drawing conclusions based solely on the object’s surface​ composition, ⁣stating, “We ⁣should not decide about the nature of 3I/ATLAS based on the chemical composition of its skin, for​ the ⁢same reason ⁢that we should not judge a book by ​its cover.”

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.