Trump Criticizes Smithsonian, Claiming Focus on Slavery is excessive
WASHINGTON D.C. – Former President Donald Trump has publicly criticized the Smithsonian Institution, asserting its exhibits place undue emphasis on the negative aspects of American history, specifically slavery.The comments, reported by The Atlantic on August 27, 2025, represent a direct challenge to the Smithsonian’s curatorial approach and reignite a long-running debate about historical representation in national museums.
Trump reportedly stated the smithsonian’s narrative is overly focused on “how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been.” This criticism suggests a disagreement with the institution’s commitment to presenting a comprehensive and often unflinching portrayal of the nation’s past, including its darker chapters.
The former president’s remarks are particularly noteworthy given the Smithsonian’s role as the nation’s foremost museum complex, entrusted with preserving and displaying artifacts and knowledge related to American history, art, and culture. the Smithsonian encompasses 19 museums and galleries, as well as the National Zoological Park, and receives meaningful federal funding.
This isn’t the first time Trump has voiced concerns about historical narratives. During his presidency, he frequently championed a more patriotic and celebratory view of American history, often downplaying or dismissing the lasting impacts of slavery and racial injustice.His recent comments echo that sentiment, suggesting a preference for a narrative that emphasizes national achievements over acknowledging systemic failures.
The Smithsonian has faced scrutiny in recent years regarding its efforts to address issues of race and inequality. The opening of the National Museum of African American History and Culture in 2016 was a landmark event, but also sparked debate about how to best represent the complexities of the African American experience. Ongoing exhibits and educational programs continue to grapple with the legacy of slavery, segregation, and ongoing racial disparities.
The debate over the Smithsonian’s approach highlights a broader cultural conversation about how history should be taught and presented. Some argue that a more critical and inclusive approach is necessary to understand the present and build a more just future, while others believe that focusing on negative aspects of the past undermines national pride and unity. The Smithsonian, as a publicly funded institution, finds itself at the center of this complex and often contentious discussion.Further Reading from The Atlantic:
A feature on the evolving portrayal of Bobby Hill from King of the Hill and his resonance with Millennial anxieties.
A photo essay showcasing compelling images from around the world.
A link to The Atlantic’s daily crossword puzzle.
Rafaela Jinich contributed to this newsletter.
When you buy a book using a link in this newsletter, we receive a commission.Thank you for supporting the Atlantic.*
