Home » News » Cutting aid for disease fund would be moral failure, Labour MPs tell Starmer | Labour

Cutting aid for disease fund would be moral failure, Labour MPs tell Starmer | Labour

by Emma Walker – News Editor

Labor MPs Urge Starmer to Reverse Proposed Cuts to Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis adn Malaria

LONDON – A growing ⁣number of labour⁢ MPs ⁤are publicly ⁣imploring‌ Keir Starmer to ‍reconsider a commitment to cut funding to the​ Global fund to ​Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and ⁤Malaria should labour win‍ the upcoming UK general election. The proposed policy, outlined in‍ a recent briefing ‍document, has sparked a backlash from within the party,⁣ with ⁣critics arguing it would represent a “moral failure” and undermine global health ‍security.

The ‌planned cuts, reportedly ⁤intended⁣ to free up funds⁤ for domestic priorities, have ignited a fierce internal debate over the balance between addressing issues ‌at home and fulfilling international obligations. The Global Fund, a partnership ⁢between governments, the private sector and ‍civil society, provides critical funding for programs combating three of‌ the world’s most devastating infectious diseases,⁢ notably in low- and middle-income countries. Labour’s potential shift in ⁤policy comes as the Global Fund prepares to launch a new three-year funding cycle,⁤ seeking $18 ⁤billion to accelerate progress towards ending these epidemics.

Shadow Cabinet members including Thangam Debbonaire and Jonathan Ashworth have voiced their opposition, alongside prominent backbenchers.Debbonaire stated the cuts would be a “terrible mistake” and “a moral failure,” while Ashworth warned they would have “devastating consequences” for global ‍health. Several mps have written‍ to Starmer directly, urging him to ⁤reinstate a commitment to the Global Fund, arguing that investing in global health ⁣is‍ not onyl ethically right but also serves the UK’s national interests ‍by preventing the spread of infectious diseases and promoting stability.

The‌ Guardian⁢ reported that the briefing‍ document suggested Labour would instead focus on bilateral aid programs,but ​critics argue this approach‍ lacks the efficiency and‌ impact of the global Fund’s collaborative model. The Global Fund leverages contributions from multiple donors, reducing duplication and‍ maximizing resources. A reversal of the ⁢proposed cuts would signal Labour’s continued commitment to international development and ‍its⁤ leadership in the⁢ fight against global health crises. The party is expected to ⁣finalize its manifesto​ pledges in the coming weeks, setting the stage for a crucial decision on the future of UK support for the Global fund.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.