Chiang Wan-an and Shen Bo-yang Clash Over Polls and Political Attacks
Chiang Wan-an holds a 15.4 percentage point lead over Shen Bo-yang in recent polling data. While Chiang maintains a significant advantage, Chang Yi-shan suggests the gap will narrow as the election date approaches.
Chiang recently traveled to Hualien to call for the resignation of Premier Cho Jung-tai, a move that has triggered a divide between the candidates regarding the priorities of the Taipei city government versus national political ambitions.
Polling Disparities and the Late-Race Convergence
The current lead of 15.4 percentage points positions Chiang Wan-an as the frontrunner. Chang Yi-shan noted that as the election gets closer, the gap will narrow.
The Hualien Controversy and Executive Priorities
Chiang Wan-an’s decision to visit Hualien to demand the resignation of Premier Cho Jung-tai has become a central flashpoint. Shen Bo-yang characterized the move as “quite provocative,” suggesting that the Mayor is prioritizing national power plays over the immediate needs of Taipei residents.
Reports indicate that parents in Taipei are expressing frustration over school safety notifications. Specifically, critics point to a situation where 109 school safety reports were filed, yet only 80,000 yuan of funding were allocated, leading to claims that the administration is neglecting local crises.
Shen Bo-yang further accused the Taipei City Government of “answering B when asked A” and avoiding transparency. He specifically cited a pattern of “covering up” issues ranging from child abuse cases to the city’s general budget.
Direct Clashes Over Governance and Accountability
Chiang Wan-an has responded to these criticisms with direct counter-attacks.
Comparative Framing of the Campaign
| Focus Area | Chiang Wan-an’s Position | Shen Bo-yang’s Position |
|---|---|---|
| National Role | Active in calling for cabinet changes (Premier Cho). | Argues municipal duties should precede national ambition. |
| City Management | Maintains a strong polling lead. | Points to school safety funding gaps and budget opacity. |
| Communication | Direct, aggressive counter-attacks. | Accuses administration of “answering B to question A.” |
Long-term Implications for Taipei Infrastructure
The dispute over the 80,000-yuan allocation for school safety is an example of the disconnect between city hall’s reporting and the reality experienced by parents.