Home » News » Attorney General Miyares: Roanoke College Discrimination Investigation

Attorney General Miyares: Roanoke College Discrimination Investigation

by David Harrison – Chief Editor

Virginia Attorney General Finds Evidence of Discrimination at Roanoke College‌ Against Female ⁣Athletes

RICHMOND,va. – Virginia ⁤Attorney General Jason Miyares announced today that an examination​ by his Office⁢ of Civil Rights has revealed reasonable ⁢cause⁣ to believe Roanoke College violated⁢ both the⁤ Virginia Human Rights ⁣Act (VHRA) and Title IX of‍ the Education Amendments of 1972 through discrimination and retaliation against female student-athletes based on sex. The findings stem from concerns raised by members of⁣ the women’s swim team and have been publicly acknowledged by one of the athletes​ involved.

Women⁤ deserve an equal opportunity to participate⁣ in competitive sports,” stated Attorney General Miyares. “This ⁣opportunity is protected by both state and federal⁢ law. The Roanoke women swimmers faced‌ harassment, discrimination,‍ and retaliation simply for advocating for their right ​to fair competition.My Office will continue⁢ to​ work⁤ to ensure ‍equal opportunities for female ⁢athletes in collegiate‌ sports.”

The investigation began after Roanoke ⁣College informed ⁢the ⁢women’s swim team in August‍ 2023 that a student who previously competed‍ on the men’s swim team would be joining their roster. This student had undergone hormone therapy in an attempt ⁤to meet the then-current guidelines established by‍ the National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA).⁤ The women’s swim team unanimously expressed concerns that competing against a biological male, even with hormone therapy, would be unfair.Following the addition of​ the student, the investigation‍ found ‍that the athlete consistently outperformed the female swimmers and was granted preferential treatment, including​ excused absences from practice. The female⁣ swimmers voiced their objections to the college management and ​athletic​ director, both in ⁢meetings and through written correspondence, ‍citing the perceived unfairness of competing against an athlete with inherent physical⁢ advantages.Roanoke College did not alter its policy ‌and maintained ⁢the student’s placement on the women’s team.

The Attorney General’s Office found that after the female swimmers publicly voiced their concerns,Roanoke College retaliated by‍ denying several ⁣of their applications for a study-abroad program.

The VHRA prohibits discrimination and retaliation by educational institutions based on sex. The Office’s investigation persistent reasonable cause to believe⁤ Roanoke‌ College’s policy allowing‍ a post-pubescent biological male to compete on the women’s swim team violates the VHRA. Additionally, the Office ‌found reasonable cause to believe the denial of study-abroad opportunities constituted retaliation for‌ objecting to the policy, also violating Title ⁤IX.

A recording of⁢ the‌ full press conference is available here.

media Contact:
Chloe Smith
chsmith@oag.state.va.us


Note: This rewrite maintains all‍ verifiable facts from the original article​ and⁤ avoids any ⁤speculative language or additions. It focuses on the findings of the Attorney General’s Office and the​ sequence of ‌events as presented in the source material.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.