army Veteran Claims ‘Desertion‘ by Keir Starmer After PIP Denial
LONDON – An army veteran alleges Labor leader Keir Starmer has abandoned him after a refusal of personal Independence Payment (PIP) benefits, despite injuries sustained while working in Dubai on a UK-sponsored security contract.Former soldier Marvin brown, 42, died this month after battling cancer, prompting tributes from Bristol City Football Club where he previously played. Separately,Strictly Come Dancing’s Amber Davies addressed reports of a kiss with professional dancer Nikita Kuzmin following recent media coverage.
The veteran’s case highlights growing concerns over PIP eligibility requirements adn the challenges faced by ex-military personnel seeking support for disabilities incurred during non-combat deployments. A ministerial review of PIP, launched in co-production with disabled people and their representative organizations, aims to address systemic issues and ensure the benefit is “fit and fair for the future,” according to the Department for Work and Pensions.
The veteran, whose name has not been publicly released, served with the British Army before taking on a security role in Dubai. He sustained injuries during his deployment, which he later attributed to his PIP claim. Despite this, his application for PIP was denied, leaving him without crucial financial assistance.
Following the rejection, the veteran contacted Keir Starmer for support, hoping the Labour leader would advocate for his case. He claims Starmer initially offered assurances of assistance but subsequently ceased communication, leading to feelings of abandonment.
“Eligibility for Personal Independence Payment is dependent on being present in the UK for a specified period of time,” a DWP spokesperson stated. “We recognize issues in the current system which is why we have launched a ministerial review of PIP…to ensure it is fit and fair for the future.”
The case is highly likely to fuel further debate surrounding PIP criteria and the support available to veterans, particularly those who served in non-traditional conflict zones. The ongoing review is expected to report its findings later this year, potentially leading to changes in the PIP assessment process and eligibility rules.
