Home » World » AOPT vs. AOCT for Talus Lesions: 2-Year Outcomes

AOPT vs. AOCT for Talus Lesions: 2-Year Outcomes

by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor

New Trial⁣ Finds Two Surgical Approaches Equally Effective for Talus Lesions

BOSTON, MA – A ⁣new randomized controlled trial ​published ⁢today reveals⁢ that autologous osteoperiosteal‍ transplantation (AOPT) is a non-inferior⁢ option ⁤to the more established autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOCT) for treating large cystic osteochondral ⁣lesions (OLTs) of the medial talus. The findings, stemming from a prospective study registered ‍with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03347877),offer patients and surgeons ‌another viable option for addressing these debilitating ankle injuries.

Osteochondral lesions of the talus – damage to the⁢ cartilage and underlying bone – commonly‍ occur in active individuals and can lead to chronic pain and impaired⁣ function. While AOCT has⁢ long been a standard treatment, it carries the risk of donor site morbidity. This new research suggests AOPT, which utilizes bone and periosteum from a patient’s own body, can achieve comparable ‍clinical outcomes and cartilage repair​ quality, ​with possibly reduced complications. The‍ study followed 67 patients ⁣- 33‍ receiving AOPT and 34 ‌receiving AOCT – for two years⁢ post-surgery.

Researchers assessed patient outcomes using several measures, including​ the visual analog scale for pain (VAS), the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, and the ankle activity score (AAS) at ​3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Cartilage repair was ‌evaluated using the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score and arthroscopic examination via the International Cartilage Repair Society⁢ (ICRS) score. Donor site morbidity was also tracked throughout the 24-month follow-up.

the trial demonstrated no important differences between the two groups in terms of pain, function, or overall clinical enhancement as measured by the VAS, AOFAS, and ‍AAS scores. ⁣While the AOCT group initially showed better cartilage repair scores ⁤(MOCART ⁣and⁣ ICRS) within the ⁤first year, the AOPT group’s scores improved to⁢ a comparable level by the 24-month mark. Importantly, the AOPT group experienced a lower incidence of ⁤donor site morbidity and reported lower pain scores throughout the study period.

The study ‌concludes that AOPT demonstrates ‌non-inferiority to AOCT for treating large cystic OLTs, offering a​ potentially beneficial alternative with reduced donor site complications. Researchers⁣ emphasize the need for long-term follow-up to confirm these findings and fully understand ‍the durability of ​the results.

Keywords: autologous osteochondral transplantation; autologous ‍osteoperiosteal transplantation; donor‌ site morbidity; osteochondral lesions of the talus; randomized controlled⁣ trial.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.