Home » Technology » AI Hardware Thermal Pressure: Cooling Costs & Data Center Challenges

AI Hardware Thermal Pressure: Cooling Costs & Data Center Challenges

by Rachel Kim – Technology Editor

Microsoft Invests in Advanced ​Cooling to Address AI’s Growing ⁣Thermal Demands

As artificial intelligence‌ workloads surge, data centers are facing a⁤ critical challenge: managing the escalating heat generated by ​powerful new hardware. Traditional cooling methods are struggling to keep pace, prompting Microsoft to ⁣explore innovative solutions to prevent cooling costs ‍from crippling data center ​budgets and hindering the deployment of next-generation⁢ GPUs.

The increasing thermal density is driven by the ‌rapid rise⁢ in GPU power ‍consumption.According to Danish ‍Faruqui, CEO at Fab Economics, “As per 2025 AI infra buildouts TCO analysis, over 45%-47% of data center power⁣ budget ⁤typically​ goes into cooling, which could​ further ​expand to 65%-70% without advancement in cooling method efficiency.” This trend ⁤is‍ accelerating: Nvidia’s⁤ Hopper H100 GPU required 700 watts in 2024, a figure that doubled with‌ the Blackwell B200 and is‌ projected to reach 1000W and 1400W⁤ with the Blackwell‍ Ultra B300.

“Modern accelerators ‍are⁣ throwing out thermal loads that air systems simply cannot contain, ⁢and even advanced water loops are straining,” explains Sanchit ⁢Vir Gogia, CEO and ⁢chief‌ analyst at Greyhound Research. “The immediate⁣ issues are not only the soaring TDP of GPUs, but also grid delays, water scarcity, and the inability of legacy ⁣air-cooled halls to absorb racks running at⁣ 80 or 100 kilowatts.” Gogia points to the​ critical bottleneck in the “last metre⁢ of ​the thermal path, ⁢between⁤ junction and package,” ​where performance is lost‌ due to thermal interface resistance.

Looking ahead​ to 2026, Nvidia’s Rubin and Rubin​ Ultra GPUs⁢ are expected⁢ to demand 1800W and a staggering ⁣3600W respectively, further intensifying the thermal pressure. To unlock the full potential of thes⁢ GPUs,hyperscalers and neocloud⁤ providers​ must overcome these thermal‌ limitations.

Microsoft⁣ is focusing on microfluidic-based direct-to-silicon cooling‌ as a potential solution. ⁤ Faruqui believes this ‍technology could⁣ reduce cooling ⁢expenses to less than 20% of the overall data⁣ center power budget.​ However, realizing this potential requires meaningful ​research⁢ and progress focused‍ on optimizing the microfluidic structure’s size, placement, and analysis⁤ of ‍non-laminar flow within the microchannels. Successfully developing this technology is​ seen as crucial; Faruqui states that microfluidic cooling‌ “could be the sole enabler for Rubin Ultra GPU TDP budget of 3.6kW per GPU.”

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.