Home » News » ]US Military Bombed Drug Boat Survivors in Caribbean Amid Controversy

]US Military Bombed Drug Boat Survivors in Caribbean Amid Controversy

U.S.⁢ Military Accused of Targeting Survivors⁣ in Caribbean Drug Interdiction⁣ Operation

Washington D.C. – The U.S. Army is⁣ facing scrutiny following ​reports of a second attack on a suspected drug boat in the Caribbean,allegedly ⁤ordered too eliminate‍ survivors of an initial bombing. Multiple U.S. media outlets, including the Washington Post and CNN, reported on the incident Friday, raising serious questions about the legality and ethics of the ⁣ongoing military deployment in the region.

According to sources cited by The Washington‍ Post, the second attack occurred on⁤ September⁤ 2nd, following the first publicly⁣ acknowledged strike. A source familiar with the operation claimed ⁤troops were given ⁣the⁤ order, “The order was to kill everyone.” The report details how soldiers observed two⁤ individuals clinging to the​ burning wreckage‍ of the initial attack and proceeded to target ⁤them.

The allegations prompted a change in protocols, with U.S. forces now reportedly prioritizing the rescue of survivors following such operations. Though, CNN reports it remains‌ unclear whether Secretary‌ of War Pete Hegseth was aware survivors remained before authorizing the second attack.

The‌ U.S.military ‌has been conducting a heightened presence in Caribbean waters near Venezuela and in the Pacific for several weeks, ostensibly ‌to combat drug trafficking. The Venezuelan government, though, ⁤alleges‍ this ​deployment is a pretext for a plot to overthrow President Nicolás Maduro and seize the nation’s resources.

To date, Washington claims it’s operations have resulted in the deaths of at least 83 individuals suspected of drug trafficking. These actions have drawn sharp criticism from ⁣legal experts, who have⁢ labeled them potential “extrajudicial executions.”

In a statement posted on social media Friday, Hegseth defended the operations, asserting they are “legal under both U.S. and international law.” The legality of the attacks remains a point‌ of contention, with ongoing debate surrounding the parameters⁣ of the U.S. mission and the justification for lethal force.


caldwell, world-today-news.com

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.