Home » World » : Credit Suisse AT1 Ruling: Key Legal Distinction Explained

: Credit Suisse AT1 Ruling: Key Legal Distinction Explained

by Priya Shah – Business Editor

Swiss ‌Court Ruling on Credit⁤ Suisse AT1 Bonds May Favor limited Bondholder Recovery

Zurich – A Swiss court’s decision to overturn a regulatory order that wiped ⁣out⁤ Sfr16.5 billion ($20.53 billion) of Credit Suisse’s Additional Tier 1 (AT1) ⁢bonds doesn’t guarantee full recovery for all investors, with legal experts suggesting onyl roughly a third may ultimately benefit. The ruling hinges on a critical distinction within Swiss law between ‌”annulment” and declaring⁤ something⁤ “null and void,” a nuance that will determine the scope of potential payouts.

The Swiss ⁢Financial Market Supervisory Authority (Finma) originally⁣ ordered ⁢the write-down of Credit Suisse’s AT1 bonds as part of the emergency rescue orchestrated by UBS in March 2023. While⁤ the court found Finma’s process flawed, the ruling doesn’t automatically reinstate the bonds’ original ⁤value. Instead,‍ it compels Finma to reassess its decision, perhaps leading to⁣ a revised write-down amount or, in some cases, partial recovery for bondholders.

The core‌ of the legal debate centers on whether the bonds⁣ were ⁣legitimately written down, or ⁢if⁢ the entire ⁤process should be considered invalid ⁣from the start. According to Swiss law, “annulment” implies‍ a‍ flawed procedure but doesn’t necessarily erase the ​original‌ action, while “null and void” signifies the action was never legally valid. The court’s decision leans towards annulment, meaning Finma must revisit its decision-making process.

“The court didn’t ​say the write-down was illegal,it said the way it was‍ done was illegal,” explained⁣ a legal source familiar with the case. “This is a crucial difference. ‍It opens the door for bondholders ​to argue for a ‍fairer outcome,but it⁤ doesn’t guarantee they’ll get back⁤ everything they lost.”

Analysts estimate that approximately one-third‌ of the AT1 bondholders may have a strong legal basis ​to ‍claim for further compensation,especially those who can demonstrate significant financial harm as a direct result⁣ of the write-down. The​ remaining​ two-thirds may find their claims less‌ compelling,given the complexities of Swiss law and the court’s limited scope of⁢ review.

The ruling is expected to⁢ trigger a wave of legal challenges from AT1 bondholders seeking to ‌maximize their recovery. Finma is currently ​reviewing the court’s decision and will announce its next steps in due course. Investors seeking further information can contact info@risk.net.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.