Home » Health » Title: Breast Conservation Risks Reassessed: New Study Challenges Previous Concerns

Title: Breast Conservation Risks Reassessed: New Study Challenges Previous Concerns

by Dr. Michael Lee – Health Editor

Mastectomy No Better​ Than ⁤Breast Conservation for Young Women wiht Breast Cancer,⁢ New Study Finds

BOSTON, MA – Mastectomy does not offer a ⁣significant advantage over breast-conserving‌ surgery followed​ by radiation‍ therapy‌ for young women diagnosed with breast‍ cancer, according to findings from the US young Women’s Breast ‍Cancer Study published in Deutsches Ärzteblatt. The research ⁢challenges conventional thinking regarding the need for more ‍aggressive surgical ⁢approaches in this patient ​population.

The study⁤ analyzed data from 1,153 ⁣patients‌ who ‍underwent surgery between October 2006 adn June 2016. Age demographics within ⁣the cohort revealed 12.8% were under 30, 28% were‌ between 31‍ and 35, and 59.2% were between 36 ‍and 40 years old. Breast-conserving​ surgery was utilized⁣ in 30% of cases, with 98% of those patients subsequently receiving radiation. The remaining ​patients opted for mastectomy, frequently ⁢enough ⁢bilateral due ‌to heightened‌ genetic risk ⁢concerns common in ⁤younger​ women. ‌Radiation therapy followed mastectomy in‌ 54% of these patients.

Researchers, led by Prof. Laura Dominici⁤ MD from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, reported a locoregional recurrence rate ⁤of 6.7% after breast-conserving surgery, observed⁣ over an average of 10.1 years. Following⁤ mastectomy without radiotherapy, the ⁣recurrence rate was 6.5%, while mastectomy with radiation yielded a rate‌ of 2.4%.

“This⁤ means that ⁤breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy ‌could be an alternative to mastectomy without radiotherapy,” Dominici stated. The improved outcomes associated with mastectomy and radiotherapy ​were potentially linked to its​ preferential‌ use in patients identified as having a higher risk of distant metastases – a group excluded from the analysis due to‍ the clinical irrelevance of locoregional recurrences in the⁢ presence of distant‌ disease.

Dominici ‍attributes the‍ lower recurrence ‌rates observed in the Young ‌Women’s Study (YWS) cohort compared to the POSH⁢ cohort to advancements in treatment ‌protocols. Specifically, 28.1% of YWS patients⁣ received neoadjuvant chemotherapy,⁤ compared‍ to 15.5% in the POSH cohort. Moreover, ⁢92.2% versus ⁤12.5% ⁢of patients received‍ ERBB2-targeted therapy when appropriate.

comparing the current ⁢findings to an analysis of the Saarland cancer registry published in BMC Cancer, Dominici⁤ noted a ​locoregional recurrence ‌rate‍ of 8% ⁤across all age groups diagnosed between 1999 and 2009. ⁤Dominici concluded that, with⁤ comprehensive therapy, younger patients ‍do not demonstrate an⁢ elevated risk of locoregional recurrence.

DOI: 10.3238/Persgyn.2025.10.17.08

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.