Home » News » Digital ID Cards: UK Plans Spark Debate and Civil Liberties Concerns

Digital ID Cards: UK Plans Spark Debate and Civil Liberties Concerns

by Emma Walker – News Editor

Labour Leader Keir Starmer Expected to Announce Digital ID Card Plans

keir Starmer ​is expected to announce plans for a digital ID card scheme, dubbed “BritCard,” possibly at the Labour Party conference. the proposed system ‌aims to strengthen border controls ⁤and ​combat illegal working and renting practices.

The technology is highly likely to be built‌ upon the government’s existing “One Login” infrastructure,‍ which currently provides access​ to approximately ⁤50 government services, including ⁤teacher applications and lasting‌ power of attorney⁣ management.

According to ⁤a report outlining the plans, the “BritCard” would make‌ it more arduous to violate regulations surrounding illegal⁣ work and rent, and⁣ would facilitate the identification and prosecution of exploitative employers and landlords. Kirsty Innes, author of the report and​ formerly the thinktank’s director ‌of technology,​ is now a special⁤ adviser to Liz Kendall, the technology secretary. Upon the report’s publication,Innes stated that a⁤ functioning ⁣progressive society requires “meaningful borders.”

The proposal has⁤ received​ support from the Tony Blair Institute, with director of government innovation ‌Alexander Iosad calling a universal digital ID “one of the most important steps” a government could take to improve public services and build citizen trust.

Though,‌ the plans face opposition from several corners. Conservative MP David Davis, a long-time opponent of national ID cards, expressed concerns about data ‌security, stating that if leading tech companies struggle to protect personal data, he has “little‍ faith that Whitehall would⁣ be able to do better.”

The Liberal Democrats indicated ⁣they​ would not support a “mandatory digital ID” requiring citizens to surrender private⁢ data‍ for daily life. ⁤While the Conservatives have ⁢not formally stated a position, leader⁢ Kemi Badenoch emphasized the need for a “proper national debate” before mandating such a system, suggesting⁣ the proclamation might potentially be a distraction from⁤ internal party issues.

Critics also point to potential harms based on existing digital visa schemes for migrants. ‍Jim Killock, executive director of Open Rights Group, argued the scheme⁣ is ill-timed ‌during a cost ‍of living crisis and warned of the potential for a “digital surveillance infrastructure” leading to a⁤ “pre-crime state.” He cited instances of individuals facing travel disruptions, lost job offers, and ⁣homelessness due to errors within current digital ID systems.

David Rennie,a former Home Office ‌official involved in previous ID card programs,dismissed ‍the idea that a digital ID would effectively curb illegal migration,noting‍ existing ⁢right-to-work verification ⁢requirements already carry significant penalties for employers.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.