Home » Health » CT Before Pregnancy: Study Findings Overstated, Says AAPM

CT Before Pregnancy: Study Findings Overstated, Says AAPM

by Dr. Michael Lee – Health Editor

AAPM Challenges Findings Linking Pre-Pregnancy CT Scans⁣ to Adverse Outcomes

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The american Association of Physicists in​ Medicine (AAPM) has issued a response to a recent Annals of Internal ‌Medicine study⁤ suggesting a link between CT​ scans ‍performed before conception‍ and⁤ increased risks of miscarriage and congenital anomalies. the AAPM argues that pre-existing ‍health conditions, rather then radiation exposure, ‌are more likely responsible for the observed ⁣outcomes.

The study, published alongside an accompanying editorial, ‌concluded that exposure to CT imaging prior to​ conception was associated with a modestly elevated risk. ‌However, the AAPM points out the study found similar results‍ for both ​abdominal/pelvic CTs and head CTs -⁢ exposures ​delivering⁤ essentially zero ​radiation to the ⁢ovaries. “If head CT exams, with no ovary exposure,⁤ resulted in ⁤an increase in miscarriage and ⁣congenital anomalies, radiation ​dose to the ⁤ovaries⁤ does ‌not explain⁣ their findings,” the AAPM stated in a press release.

The association ​highlighted substantially higher rates of comorbidities ‍among women who ⁤underwent ​CT scans in the two years before conception,⁣ including obesity, diabetes mellitus, sexually transmitted infection, pelvic inflammatory​ disease, endometriosis, thyroid⁢ disorder, mental health conditions, and smoking ⁤- rates 50 to 100% higher than those who did⁢ not. The AAPM contends ⁣these underlying medical conditions, necessitating the ​CT scans in ‌the ​first place,⁤ are a ‌more plausible description for the observed outcomes.

The⁢ AAPM also took issue with the editorial ⁢accompanying‍ the study, asserting it “dismisses the extensive research on this topic over the past nine ⁤decades.” The‍ organization emphasized the long-standing commitment of radiologists, physicists, and other medical professionals to⁢ ensuring ‍the safety of radiation exposure⁤ for both patients and future⁢ conceptions.

While acknowledging the Simard study’s results, the AAPM maintains they are not ​”profound” and will not alter its existing recommendations.the association concluded the study’s findings ​do not provide sufficient evidence to suggest that having ‌more than one to ⁤three CT ⁣scans before pregnancy impacts fetal outcomes.

The Annals of Internal ⁢medicine ‍ study is available at https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-03479. ​The AAPM’s full​ response can be found⁣ at https://w3.aapm.org/media/releases/AAPM_response_Study_Annals.pdf and its critique of the editorial at https://w3.aapm.org/media/releases/AAPM_response_Study_Editorial.pdf.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.