Defunct Gas Pipeline Projects See Renewed Push Amid Energy debate
ALBANY, NY – several natural gas pipeline projects previously shelved due to opposition and market conditions are experiencing a resurgence in discussion as new York state grapples with energy demands and debates over its transition to renewable sources.proposals like the Constitution Pipeline, the northern Access Pipeline, and expansions to existing lines are being revisited by energy companies and, increasingly, by state lawmakers seeking to bolster reliability and address potential price spikes.
Thes projects, initially proposed years ago to transport natural gas from Pennsylvania’s Marcellus Shale region to New york and New England, faced fierce resistance from environmental groups and landowners concerned about environmental impacts and potential disruptions. However, a combination of factors – including increased energy costs, concerns about grid stability as coal and nuclear plants retire, and the ongoing geopolitical instability impacting global energy markets – has prompted a reevaluation of the role natural gas could play in the state’s energy future.
The Constitution Pipeline, proposed in 2013 to carry gas 124 miles from Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania, to Schoharie County, New York, was denied a key water quality permit by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in 2016, effectively halting the project. Similarly, the Northern Access Pipeline, planned to deliver gas to new York from Pennsylvania, faced regulatory hurdles and ultimately was abandoned by its developers in 2020.
Now, with New York facing potential energy shortfalls and escalating costs, notably during peak demand, some officials are arguing that utilizing existing infrastructure and revisiting previously rejected projects is a pragmatic approach. Proponents emphasize the need for a diversified energy portfolio and argue that natural gas can serve as a reliable “bridge fuel” while the state continues to invest in renewable energy sources.
“We need to be realistic about our energy needs,” stated Senator George Borrello (R-Sunset Bay) in a recent press release. “Renewables are critically important, but they aren’t capable of meeting our demands right now. we need to explore all options, including responsibly utilizing natural gas, to ensure affordable and reliable energy for New Yorkers.”
Environmental advocates remain skeptical, arguing that investing in new fossil fuel infrastructure would lock the state into decades of reliance on polluting energy sources and undermine its climate goals. They contend that focusing on energy efficiency, renewable energy development, and grid modernization is a more enduring and cost-effective path forward.
The debate is expected to intensify in the coming months as the state legislature considers energy policy proposals and the Public Service commission evaluates the long-term energy plan. The future of these defunct pipeline projects, and the role of natural gas in New York’s energy mix, remains uncertain.
