Warning Against Sundby Proposal: “Cannot Stifle the Best”
Martin Johnsrud Sundby, Norwegian skiing legend, warns that Norway’s systemic dominance in cross-country skiing—highlighted by 24 World Cup wins in 27 attempts during the 2025/2026 season—threatens the sport’s viability. Sundby urges FIS to implement budget caps and participant limits to restore international competitiveness and global appeal.
The current state of international cross-country skiing has shifted from a competitive global circuit to a predictable Norwegian exhibition. The breaking point arrived in mid-March during the Holmenkollen 50km race, where the results list served as a stark visualization of this imbalance: eight Norwegian men occupied the top spots, with ten of the top 12 finishers representing Norway. For a sport that relies on global viewership and sponsorship to thrive, this level of hegemony is a commercial and athletic dead end.
Sundby’s alarm isn’t based on a sudden spike in talent, but on a compounding structural advantage. He identifies a three-pronged monopoly: economic superiority, material dominance, and physical preparation. When one nation possesses significantly more funding and better equipment while simultaneously maintaining a higher aerobic capacity across its entire roster, the competitive integrity of the event vanishes. The problem is no longer about who trains harder, but who has the deeper pockets and the superior technical infrastructure.
The Economics of a Monopoly: 2025/2026 Win Distribution
The disparity in the current 2025/2026 World Cup season is staggering when compared to previous eras. In the 2010/2011 season, the sport enjoyed a healthy distribution of talent, with 17 different male skiers from eight different nations claiming victories. Today, that diversity has evaporated. The raw data from the current season reveals a near-total shutdown of the podium for any non-Norwegian athlete.
| Nation | World Cup Wins (2025/2026 Season) |
|---|---|
| Norway | 24 |
| USA | 1 |
| France | 1 |
| Italy | 1 |
| All Other Nations | 0 |
This statistical anomaly suggests that the “sporting” element of the competition is being superseded by resource allocation. While the women’s side of the sport remains more balanced—with Swedish skiers like Frida Karlsson maintaining a competitive edge—the men’s circuit is effectively stagnant. The dominance didn’t simply appear after Russia was barred from international competition in 2022; VG research indicates this trend began as early as 2019, suggesting a long-term systemic drift toward Norwegian supremacy.
Tactical Imbalances and the Proposed “Struple”
To combat this, Sundby is proposing a radical overhaul of the FIS regulatory framework. He suggests the implementation of cost ceilings to prevent the wealthiest federations from simply buying a technical advantage in wax chemistry and ski preparation. Equipment equalization is another pillar of his proposal, aiming to strip away the material gaps that allow Norwegian athletes to glide more efficiently than their counterparts.
“We have no sport left if we do not address the imbalance that is sporting, material, and economic. Norway cannot have many times better economy or be many times better on skis and material, in addition to being better physically. Then we are dead.”
Beyond the gear, Sundby is calling for participant restrictions for Norway in international competitions. By limiting the number of Norwegian entries, FIS could artificially create space for other nations to gain experience and visibility, preventing the “wall of blue” from blocking the podium. For nations attempting to break this cycle, the challenge is often legal and administrative as much as it is athletic. Federations looking to restructure their funding models or challenge existing FIS regulations often require specialized sports contract lawyers and regulatory consultants to navigate the complex bylaws of international governing bodies.
The Local Economic Ripple Effect
This lack of competition has direct implications for host cities and regional economies. Events like the Holmenkollen 50km rely on the drama of a close race to drive ticket sales and tourism. When the outcome is a foregone conclusion, the “halo effect” for local hospitality diminishes. The excitement that fills hotels and restaurants in Oslo is predicated on the possibility of an upset. If the sport becomes a predictable coronation, the incentive for international fans to travel drops, directly impacting regional event security and premium hospitality vendors who manage the overflow of these massive gatherings.

the physical gap Sundby mentions is a result of elite periodization and sports science. While the Norwegian national team operates with a near-infinite resource pool, emerging athletes in other countries are struggling to keep pace. To bridge this gap, aspiring professionals are increasingly seeking out high-performance athletic training centers that can replicate the data-driven approach to aerobic capacity and recovery used by the Norwegians.
The FIS Crossroads
For the first time, the International Ski and Snowboard Federation (FIS) has opened the door to discussing measures that would specifically target and potentially “hurt” Norwegian skiing at the top level. What we have is a rare admission that the health of the sport as a global product outweighs the success of its most dominant member. The debate now centers on whether the “best” should be throttled for the sake of the collective, or if the market will naturally correct itself.
Sundby, who dominated the 2010s with three overall World Cup titles and multiple Olympic golds, is now the primary voice calling for his own legacy’s blueprint to be dismantled. He recognizes that a victory without a challenge is a victory without value. The trajectory of cross-country skiing now depends on whether FIS has the courage to implement hard caps on resources or if they will allow the sport to drift into total irrelevance through its own success.
As the sport grapples with these systemic failures, the need for vetted professional support—from legal experts managing federation disputes to medical specialists optimizing athlete longevity—has never been higher. Those operating within the high-stakes environment of international athletics can find the necessary expertise through the World Today News Directory.
Disclaimer: The insights provided in this article are for informational and entertainment purposes only and do not constitute medical advice or sports betting recommendations.