US-Iran Conflict: Military Buildup & Potential Strikes | News Roundup
President Donald Trump is weighing military options in response to Iran’s accelerating nuclear program, as the U.S. Military conducts its largest buildup in the Middle East since the Iraq War. The deployment, which includes the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln and numerous warships, comes as Tehran is expected to present a novel nuclear proposal Tuesday, ahead of further indirect negotiations led by special envoy Steve Witkoff in Geneva on Thursday.
The President has reportedly expressed frustration with the limitations of potential military responses, with aides indicating that a strike on Iranian assets would likely not be a “singular, decisive blow,” but could escalate into a wider regional conflict. Military planners have cautioned against expecting a quick or guaranteed outcome from any military action, according to sources familiar with the matter.
Trump, however, has publicly signaled a desire for a forceful response. In a post on his social media platform Monday, he stated, “Everything that has been written about a potential War with Iran has been written incorrectly, and purposefully so.” He added, “I am the one that makes the decision, I would rather have a Deal than not but, if we don’t make a Deal, it will be a very bad day for that Country and, very sadly, its people.”
The President’s assessment of the potential for a swift victory contrasts with advice from his top military advisor, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine. Trump refuted reports that Caine had warned of risks associated with a military strike, including potential munitions shortages and a lack of allied support. Trump claimed Caine believes a war with Iran would be “something easily won.” A senior military official confirmed to CBS News that military planners are providing unbiased advice.
The options under consideration range from maintaining the current military posture to compel negotiations, to a limited strike targeting military facilities, and even a more aggressive approach aimed at regime change. The potential consequences of each option are significant, with military officials warning of a protracted conflict.
Negotiations are currently being conducted indirectly, with Oman and Qatar serving as intermediaries between U.S. And Iranian delegations. The upcoming meeting in Geneva will be the second round of these indirect talks. The focus remains on Iran’s nuclear program, which Trump previously claimed to have “obliterated,” but which has seen advancements in recent years.