Updated Drawbridge Operation Rules for Ventnor City, NJ

by Emma Walker – News Editor

Okay,here’s a breakdown of the‌ legal and regulatory considerations⁤ discussed⁢ in the ‌provided text,organized for clarity:

1. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

* ⁢ Assessment: the Coast Guard steadfast this rule does not require a regulatory flexibility ‌analysis.
* Reasoning: The‌ rule is not considered a⁣ “important rule” under the RFA‍ because it won’t have a significant economic impact on a ​significant number of small entities.

2. ⁤Small Business‌ Regulatory Enforcement ⁤Fairness Act (SBREFA)

* ⁤ Assessment: The Coast guard certified ⁣that​ this rule was not subject to​ the reporting requirements of SBREFA.
* Reasoning: The rule is not⁤ a ⁢”major rule” as defined by⁤ SBREFA.

3.Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)

* Assessment: This rule ⁢does⁤ not have federalism implications.
* Reasoning: It doesn’t ⁤significantly affect the rights, responsibilities, or​ distribution of power between the Federal Government​ and the ‌States.

4. Executive Order 13175 (Tribal Consultation)

* ‍ Assessment: ⁤ This rule does not have tribal implications.
* Reasoning: ⁣It doesn’t have a substantial direct ⁤affect on Indian tribes, the⁣ relationship between⁤ the Federal Government and tribes, or the ⁣distribution of power/responsibilities.

5. Unfunded ​Mandates Reform Act

* ⁤ Assessment: The rule does ‍not​ trigger ⁣the requirements of the Unfunded Mandates reform⁢ Act.
*‍ Reasoning: ​ It won’t result in ​expenditures of $100 million or more (adjusted for ​inflation) by​ State, local, ‍or tribal governments, or the private‌ sector in any one year.

6. National​ Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

* ⁤‌ Assessment: The rule is categorically excluded from further environmental review under NEPA.
* Reasoning: ⁣It promulgates operating ‌regulations for drawbridges, which falls under a category of​ actions with no​ significant environmental impact (DHS⁢ Instruction ⁤Manual ⁤023-01-001-01, Rev. 1, paragraph ‍L49, Appendix⁤ A, ⁤Table 1).
* Documentation: Neither⁤ a‌ Record of Environmental consideration nor a Memorandum for the Record is required.

In essence, the‌ Coast Guard has concluded ​that ​this rule is‍ a relatively minor regulatory change that doesn’t trigger the need for extensive analysis under several key laws and executive orders.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.