Home » Health » Title: Supreme Court Permits Trump’s Sex Designation Policy for Passports

Title: Supreme Court Permits Trump’s Sex Designation Policy for Passports

by Dr. Michael Lee – Health Editor

Supreme Court Allows Trump Administration Passport Policy ‌to Proceed

Washington ⁤D.C. -‌ In a ⁢6-3 decision Thursday, teh U.S. Supreme Court permitted the Trump administration to implement its ‌policy requiring passport applicants to list their‍ sex as designated on their birth ‌certificate. The ruling overturns a lower⁢ court order that had paused the policy,which ⁣allowed applicants to self-identify ⁣as male (M),female (F),or neither (X).

The policy, ⁣initially ‌challenged in⁤ 2021, had been blocked by a lower ⁢court, prompting the biden administration to appeal⁣ to ⁢the Supreme Court after the U.S. Court of⁣ Appeals for the Frist Circuit refused to intervene. the government argued​ the⁢ injunction “injures the United​ States by compelling it ⁣to⁣ speak‍ to foreign governments in contravention of both the⁤ President’s foreign policy adn ⁣scientific​ reality.”

The case was ⁣brought by a nationwide group of plaintiffs led⁤ by Ashton ⁣Orr, a transgender man who experienced issues with airport ⁢security while traveling with a passport reflecting a female⁢ sex marker.⁢ Orr’s legal team argued⁢ the policy would harm transgender and non-binary​ individuals, impede the ⁢government’s ability to accurately identify citizens, and stemmed‍ from unconstitutional transphobia, violating the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause. They asserted in briefs​ that the ‍policy was “aimed at the rejection‍ of the identity of an entire group – transgender Americans‌ – who have always existed,” ​and that the ​government acknowledged the “outing of transgender, intersex, and​ nonbinary individuals” as‍ a core result.

The supreme Court’s unsigned order stated ⁢that⁣ “displaying passport holders’ sex at birth no more⁣ offends⁤ equal protection principles then displaying their country of⁣ birth,” adding that‌ the government‌ is “merely attesting to a historical fact without subjecting anyone to differential treatment.”

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, joined by the‍ court’s two other ⁣liberal justices. She characterized the order as a “pointless but painful perversion of our equitable discretion,” and wrote that the Court had “once again paved the way for the immediate infliction of injury without adequate (or, ‌really, any) justification.”

the Court’s decision is not a final ruling. The policy will remain in‌ effect while‌ litigation continues in the lower courts. ⁢Male ​and female sex markers have been listed⁢ on U.S. passports as 1976, with the option‌ to reflect gender identity – rather than birth‌ sex – available for over 30⁣ years.The “X”⁤ designation was ‌introduced in 2021 under the‍ Biden administration.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.