Lizzo Advocates for Worldwide “Cancellation” as Public scrutiny Intensifies
LOS ANGELES, CA – Lizzo has sparked debate with a recent suggestion that “everyone should get cancelled at least once,” reflecting a broader cultural moment where standards for public figures-and individuals generally-are increasingly stringent and rapidly evolving.The Grammy-winning artist’s comments come amid heightened public discourse surrounding morality, accountability, and the consequences of past actions, particularly as conservative viewpoints gain prominence.
The statement, made in light of Lizzo’s own recent experiences with intense public scrutiny, underscores a growing sentiment that the current climate of “cancel culture” is both pervasive and possibly beneficial. Lizzo herself has faced a series of challenges this year, including a lawsuit over an uncleared sample in an unreleased song referencing Sydney Sweeney and headlines stemming from her critique of social media algorithms impacting music promotion. These experiences, coupled with a broader shift in societal expectations, appear to have informed her outlook on the value of facing public accountability.
Earlier this year, Lizzo told Billboard that intense public scrutiny led her to “lose trust in myself for awhile,” but she has as reaffirmed her confidence in her vision and creativity. “I’m so confident, and I think the thing that I’m most confident in now is me, my vision and my creativity,” she stated. She added that many people “think they’re the experts,” but that true confidence comes from “being proud of who I am and not hiding who I am in all the aspects of it.”
Beyond her personal challenges, Lizzo has remained active in the music scene. She recently performed a medley of ‘Still Bad‘ and ‘Love In Real Life’ as the musical guest on Saturday Night Live. She also publicly commented on the lack of a definitive “song of the summer,” attributing it to the difficulties artists face in breaking through social media algorithms.
The artist’s advocacy for universal “cancellation” raises questions about the potential for growth and self-reflection when individuals are held accountable for their actions, even as the definition of what constitutes a “cancellable offense” continues to narrow. The debate highlights a complex tension between the desire for justice and the potential for overly punitive consequences in an increasingly polarized society.
