Home » Business » Title: EPA Funding of Climate Judiciary Project – Attorneys General Coalition

Title: EPA Funding of Climate Judiciary Project – Attorneys General Coalition

by Priya Shah – Business Editor

Montana AG Leads 23 States Demanding EPA Halt‌ Funding to Climate Advocacy Group Training Judges

HELENA,MT – Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen is spearheading ⁣a bipartisan⁢ coalition of 23 state attorneys general in a demand to teh U.S. Environmental ⁣Protection Agency (EPA) to revoke‍ grants awarded to the Environmental Law Institute (ELI). The ELI is accused of using taxpayer ​funds to promote a​ specific climate⁣ agenda through ​training programs aimed at judges nationwide.

In a ⁣strongly worded letter sent Tuesday‍ to EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin,Knudsen details⁢ concerns that the ELI’s “Climate‌ Judiciary Project” – which has already reached over 2,000 judges with⁤ its seminars and workshops – isn’t providing neutral education,but ‍rather‌ actively lobbying the judiciary to ‌enact climate policy ⁢through legal rulings. The ⁣ELI received approximately 13%​ of its revenue from EPA grants in 2023, with an ‍additional 8.4% allocated for ‍2024.

“As attorney general, I​ refuse to stand by while⁢ Americans’⁢ tax dollars fund radical environmental training for judges ⁤across the country,” Knudsen stated. “The Environmental Law Institute’s Climate Judiciary Project is using woke climate propaganda, ⁢under⁤ the guise of what they call ‘neutral’ education, to persuade judges and push their wildly unpopular ⁣agenda through the court system.”

The​ core of the complaint lies‌ in the ELI’s presentation of climate science. ​Critics argue that the training exposes judges – who may ⁢preside over climate-related cases – to materials produced by organizations directly involved in climate litigation, thus ⁢compromising judicial impartiality. This‌ raises serious questions about ⁤due ⁣process‌ and the‍ fairness of future ⁤rulings.

Moreover, ⁣Knudsen alleges that the ELI is engaging in deceptive marketing practices, violating​ state consumer protection laws​ with misleading claims about the objectivity of its training. ​ The letter emphasizes the obligation of attorneys​ general to protect consumers from ⁢false advertising.

The‍ coalition includes attorneys⁤ general from Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida,‍ Georgia, Idaho,⁤ Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, ‍Nebraska, North​ Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, ‍South Dakota, Texas,‌ Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. This broad, geographically diverse support underscores the widespread concern over the ELI’s activities.

The full letter to⁣ the EPA is available for review here.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.