The Role of Firestopping Manufacturers in Ensuring Construction Safety and Compliance
Firestopping Manufacturers Expand Design Support Following Building Safety Act Regulations
Firestopping manufacturers are expanding their technical support roles during early design stages, shifting from simple product suppliers to active participants in compliance discussions. According to a report by Glenn Hutchins, Technical Client Relations Manager at Quelfire, construction projects under post-2022 regulatory frameworks require rigorous evidence, product expertise, and early engagement to meet safety standards.
The Tech TL;DR:
- Manufacturers are shifting from basic product delivery to providing extensive test evidence and technical guidance during early design stages.
- Early engagement at RIBA Stage 2 or 3 ensures mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) services align with tested firestopping solutions.
- Project-specific design liability remains with fire consultants, principal designers, architects, and MEP contractors rather than the manufacturer.
Manufacturers Link Design Teams to Firestopping Installation
The implementation of the Building Safety Act in 2022 forced the construction industry to adopt evidence-led, collaborative workflows. Project teams must demonstrate how their designs meet strict compliance requirements. Per the report, manufacturers serve as a critical link between design teams and firestopping installation because they understand how specific products were tested, the scope of their test evidence, and their installation limits.

Products cannot be treated as standalone components. Selecting a fire collar based solely on a stated four-hour fire rating fails if the installation deviates from the tested scope of application. Context dictates performance. Manufacturers provide vital expertise during initial design discussions to ensure appropriate product selection and adherence to test parameters.
Test Evidence As the Foundation of Safe Construction
Relying on cheap or unverified alternatives creates severe risks for building occupants. Firestopping systems are complex, requiring manufacturers to guide project stakeholders through test limitations and documentation. Quelfire alone maintains over 700 tested firestopping details to accommodate diverse construction scenarios.
Project teams achieve the best compliance outcomes by engaging manufacturers during RIBA Stage 2 or 3 while coordinating MEP services. This early coordination ensures that services and builders’ work openings comply with existing test evidence before final designs lock in. Establishing clear parameters early prevents situations where services are laid out without a valid tested solution.
Manufacturers Maintain They Are Not Primary Designers
Increased manufacturer involvement in design discussions often leads to assumptions regarding design liability. However, manufacturing firms maintain that they do not assume the role of the primary designer. While companies like Quelfire explain test evidence, identify relevant systems, and clarify service penetration sealing limitations, project-specific design responsibilities rest with fire consultants, principal designers, architects, and MEP contractors.
Manufacturers must recognize the limits of their competence. Effective collaboration relies on project teams providing precise information using a structured inquiry process regarding substrates, penetrating services, required fire ratings, and installation methods. This detailed exchange helps technical teams deliver accurate solutions and supports Gateway 2 submissions and overall building safety.