Home » News » Texas Man’s Shaken Baby Syndrome Execution Halted Over New Evidence

Texas Man’s Shaken Baby Syndrome Execution Halted Over New Evidence

by Emma Walker – News Editor

Texas⁤ Execution of Robert Roberson Halted by State’s ⁤Highest ‌Criminal Court

AUSTIN, TX – The scheduled execution ⁤of‌ Texas prisoner Robert Roberson has been blocked by⁤ the state’s Court of Criminal Appeals, just days before he was set to receive a lethal injection for the 2002 death of his 16-month-old daughter, Nikki. The⁢ court issued a stay⁢ of execution Wednesday,⁤ ordering a review of claims that newly discovered evidence⁢ casts⁢ doubt on the conviction.

The case, which has ⁢drawn national attention,‍ centers ‍on questions surrounding the ​cause of Nikki Roberson’s death and whether Roberson’s autism spectrum disorder – diagnosed in 2018, years after the trial – impacted the examination.The stay comes after Roberson’s​ defense team ‌argued that evolving⁢ medical understanding of infant‌ deaths, coupled with the belated recognition of ‌Roberson’s neurodevelopmental condition, ⁢warrants ‍a re-examination of the evidence. ‌

Robert roberson was originally convicted ⁤of murder and sentenced⁣ to death in 2003. Authorities believed Nikki died from blunt-force trauma and being shaken,⁣ but Roberson’s ⁤defense now ⁤contends that other ⁢medical conditions could have contributed to her ⁣death. Former Anderson County Sheriff‌ Greg Wharton, ⁣who arrested Roberson, ‍has stated he was ⁣unaware of ⁤Nikki’s medical history ⁣and Roberson’s‌ autism⁣ at the time of the investigation, noting that Roberson’s ⁣lack of visible emotion⁣ didn’t‍ raise red​ flags given his ⁣later ‌diagnosis.

Texas ⁤attorney General Ken​ Paxton has consistently maintained⁢ Roberson’s ​guilt,⁢ publicly asserting that Roberson “murdered ‍his daughter by⁢ beating her so brutally that she ultimately died.” Paxton’s⁢ office ‌took ​over⁤ the case from the Anderson​ County District Attorney’s Office earlier⁤ this year.

The Court of Criminal Appeals has not ‍yet set a date for further ‍proceedings. The future of the case hinges on the court’s ‌assessment of the new evidence and ​it’s potential‍ impact on ⁣the original conviction.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.