Author Correction โPublished Regarding Global Chikungunya Burden Study
A correction has been issued for โคa recent study detailing theโ global burden of chikungunya virus infections and โฃassessing theโ potential impact of vaccination campaigns. The original research, published in The Lancet, significantly quantified the disease’s impact and underscored the โpotential public health โคbenefits of widespread vaccination.
The study, led by Gabriel Ribeiro dos Santos of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) in London, UK, and involving a collaborative network of researchers across Africa, Europe, and North America, initially estimated a substantial global โคburden of chikungunya. The correction addresses details within the author affiliationsโข and lists, ensuring accurate depiction of the contributions from institutions including Sokoine Universityโ of Agricultureโฃ (Tanzania), Rwanda Military Teaching Hospital andโค University of Rwanda,โ York โUniversity (Canada), โคUniversity of Ghana, University of Ilorin (Nigeria), Pasteur Network (France), Paris Citรฉ University, Institutโข Pasteurโ (france),โ Kilimanjaro christian Medical university College (Tanzania), โQatar University, and the Institut Pasteur’s Modelling of Infectious Diseases Unit. key researchersโ involved in the collaborative effort โฃinclude Christinah Mukandavire, Arminder Deol, Danny โScarponi, Leonard E.G. Mboera, Eric โขSeruyange, Mathieuโข JP Poirier, Samuel Bosomprah, Augustine O.โ Queen,โฃ Koussay Dellagi, Nathanael โฃHozรฉ, Jaffuโ Chilongola, Gheyathโฃ K.โ Nasrallah, and Simonโฃ Cauchemez.
Chikungunya virus, transmittedโค primarily byโ Aedesโ aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes, โcauses โdebilitating joint pain, fever, and rash. While typicallyโ not fatal, the chronic pain associated with the infection can significantly impair quality of life for monthsโฃ or evenโ years. โThe study’s findings areโ crucial for informing public health strategies, notably in regions where chikungunya is endemicโ or poses a significant outbreak risk.โ The corrected author details โensures proper attributionโ for thisโข importantโฃ work,which provides a foundation for evaluating the feasibility and impact ofโค future vaccination programs aimed at controlling the spread ofโ this debilitating disease.