apple’s โ”Pluribus” Creators Confront the AI Threat to Storytelling
Vince Gilligan, creator of “Breaking Bad” and “Better Callโฃ Saul,” and Rhea seehorn, star ofโข the latter,โ are tacklingโ the looming influence of artificial intelligence on creativeโข content with theirโข new Apple โTV+ โฃseries, “Pluribus.” The show, which received a two-season order, explores a world where AI generates personalized television, promptingโ Gilligan and Seehorn to openly question โคthe future of authentic storytelling.
Theโ project arrives as video-generating software like OpenAI’s Sora demonstrates the increasing capability โขof AI to produce mainstream content.Gilliganโค frames the central dilemma as a choice: “Do you wont to be fedโฃ a diet of crap? Is there enough calories in a diet of crap to keep you โalive? The answer is yeah, probably. You could eat it.” this concern underscores a broader anxiety within the โขentertainment industryโค about the potential devaluation of human creativity in the face ofโฃ rapidly advancing โขAI technology, impacting writers, actors, and ultimately, the audience experience.
Gilligan describes AI-generated content as “like a cow chewing its cud – an endlessly regurgitated โฃloop of nonsense,” expressing skepticism about effective U.S. โregulation due to โcompetition withโ China. He jokingly attributes the situation to Silicon Valley,โ stating, “Thank you,โ Silicon Valley! Yet again, you’ve fucked up the world.”
Seehorn offers โa counterpoint, emphasizing the irreplaceable value of human experience in art. While acknowledging AI’s ability to mimic artistic styles – “you can prompt an AI to paint you a Picasso” – she asserts that the emotional depth and meaning behind art stem โfrom the human processโ of creation. “Even if a computer could make you think there was impasto brushwork there, the reason the painting is moving is because ofโ the humanโข experience that went into transferring โthat art onto the canvas,” she explained.”That matters to me. I think itโค matters to most peopel.”
Despite having a preliminary โidea for the series’ conclusion,Gilligan maintains โa flexible approach to theโฃ writers’ room. “Oneโ of the most vital things I can doโฆis not โคbe tooโค precious about the ideas.โข If we come up with a better way to end this thing, we will.”
Acknowledging โคthe unpredictable natureโ of the current television landscape, Gilligan concedes thatโค “Pluribus” could be an “expensive experiment that never quite catches on.” However, given his established success, he anticipates a future โขwhere he and Seehorn will reflect on the projectโฃ with a knowing laugh.