Christian Nationalists Elevate Charlie Kirk to Martyr Status, Fueling Divisive Rhetoric
Following theโฃ death of Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA,โ a segment of Christian nationalists have begun to portray himโค as a martyr, โขsparking concern over โthe potential for escalating rhetoric and calls for retribution. This reaction highlightsโค a growing trend of framing political figures within religious narrativesโ of sacrifice andโฃ conflict.
Kirk, initially known for his secular youth organization foundedโ in 2012 andโค his widely โviewed debates on โcollege campuses, became increasingly vocal about his Christianโ faithโ in recent years. This shift led him toโ speak at churches defying COVID-19 lockdown orders, including Godspeak Calvary Chapel led by Pastor Rob โฃMcCoy, a former Thousand Oaks โmayor. McCoy now co-chairs Turning Pointโ USAโฃ Faith,โ an organization advocating for greater political engagement from pastors. Following Kirk’s death, McCoy released a statement condemning โthose who expressed joyโ at the news, calling them “instruments of evil” and urging repentance, while also emphasizing the transformative power of prayer.
According โto Professor Boedy, McCoy influenced Kirk’sโข embrace of Christian nationalism, specifically the “Seven Mountains Mandate” -โฃ a beliefโ that Christians โขshould strive for influence โขover key cultural institutions โฃincluding arts, business, education, family, government, media, andโ religion. This ideology, rejected by mainlineโ Christians, asserts that the United States was founded as a christian nation and that faith should hold a central role in governance and law.
Experts warn of the โฃdangers inherent in this ideology.Brian Levin, founder of the Center forโข the Study of Hate and Extremism, noted that the “more violent fringes ofโค Christian nationalism โhave disturbing aspects thatโ are eliminationist andโฃ antidemocratic.” He drew parallels toโข the โฃdeification of former President Donald Trump by some within the same โฃcircles, particularly after reported assassination attempts, with Trump himself claiming to have โbeen “saved byโ God.” โLevin explained โฃthat this narrative portrays Trump as “an armed โChristian warrior protecting America” from various groups,andโฃ that framing Kirk as a martyr resonates with this existing worldview.
The rhetoric โhas extended to prominent political figures.California Senate Minority leader Brian W. Jones (R-santee) labeledโค Kirkโข “aโ modern dayโค martyr” and invoked a quote from โThomas Jeffersonโค stating, “The tree of โขliberty โฃmust be refreshed from โtime to time with the blood of patriots andโ tyrants,” adding, “Let us take โฃcare that we allow that tree to grow and blossom as it feeds on the lifeblood of Charles J. Kirk in the years to come.”
Levin cautioned that the language of martyrdom inherently evokes conflict and war, and โwhile acknowledging Trump could โขhave used the moment โto unify, he rather “veered into divisive โterritory.” The elevation of Kirk toโ martyr status underscores a concerning trend of utilizing religious framing to fuel political polarization and potentially incite furtherโ unrest.