Start & Stop System: To Deactivate or Not to Deactivate? Drivers Weigh Fuel Savings against Comfort & Potential Wear
Brussels, Belgium - A growing debate is unfolding among drivers regarding the “Start & Stop” system increasingly common in modern vehicles. Designed to automatically shut off the engine when the car is stationary – at red lights or in traffic – the technology promises fuel savings and reduced emissions, but also raises concerns about driver comfort and long-term vehicle maintenance.
The system can reduce fuel consumption by up to 1.2 l/100 km, according to observations. Beyond fuel efficiency, it also reduces noise pollution for passengers by eliminating engine idling.
Tho, the frequent engine restarts can be fatiguing in stop-and-go traffic. some drivers also question the impact of repeated starts on components like the battery, starter, and engine. Automotive professionals assure that vehicles equipped with “Start & Stop” feature reinforced parts specifically designed for this increased usage.
Despite these reinforcements, automotive specialists note that wear on these components can be accelerated. “It is common to see faster wear,” they explain, adding that starters may need replacing after 100,000 km – a replacement perhaps more expensive than a conventional starter. Mitigation strategies include adopting smoother driving habits, such as slowing more gradually when approaching stops.
Ultimately, the suitability of the system depends on driving conditions and personal preference. For drivers primarily navigating urban environments, the benefits of fuel economy and reduced emissions are significant. Though, those frequently stuck in heavy traffic or bothered by the engine cycling may opt to temporarily deactivate the system via a dedicated button.
While economical and ecological, the “Start & Stop” system isn’t universally ideal, requiring drivers to balance its advantages against potential drawbacks.
