UK news

Prince Harry attended King Charles III’s coronation in London but had to leave immediately after the ceremony as he had plans to return to the U.S. for his son’s fourth birthday celebration. This was a historic event as the U.K. hadn’t seen a coronation since Queen Elizabeth II ascended to the throne before World War II. The Royal Family’s traditional attire, including ceremonial robes, were worn by all members, except Prince Harry who wore a suit. Notably, Prince Andrew, who has been involved in multiple scandals, also wore the ceremonial robes, causing understandable confusion and criticism among even sympathetic members of the monarchy. Despite the apparent distance between Prince Harry and other members of the Royal Family, he was respectful throughout the process and quickly returned home once he had fulfilled his duties.

Andrew Parker Bowles, the former husband of Queen Consort Camilla, will reportedly be at the forefront of the crowd at Westminster Abbey for the coronation of King Charles. The Sunday Times reports that Parker Bowles will witness his first wife’s coronation beside the new king. Camilla and Parker Bowles were wed in 1973 and have two children together, Tom Parker Bowles and Laura Lopes. Although Camilla married Prince Charles in 2005 and Parker Bowles exchanged vows with Rosemary Pitman in 1996, the former couple’s children and grandchildren will also take part in the ceremony. Tom’s son Freddie and Laura’s twin sons Gus and Louis, all aged 13, will be Camilla’s pages of honour and carry the train of her robe during the grand occasion. However, Sarah Ferguson, the ex-wife of Prince Andrew, will not attend King Charles’s coronation ceremony. According to royal commentator Tom Bower, Sarah had excluded herself from the event due to her past conduct. Nevertheless, some royal watchers have expressed surprise at the decision to exclude her from the coronation.

As the world eagerly awaits the next coronation ceremony for the British monarchy, speculation has been rife about the role that Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle will play in the proceedings. Despite their prominent status in the royal family, reports have emerged that the couple may not have their way when it comes to the Coronation of the next monarch. As tensions mount between the Sussexes and the rest of the family, questions are being raised about whether Harry and Meghan’s ambitions for their royal careers will be realized in this historic event.


Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have been in the spotlight since their public departure from the British Royal Family in early 2020. In a recent announcement, Prince Harry stated that he would attend the coronation of King Charles III alone, without his wife or children. While it was initially suggested that their children’s schedules were the reason for their absence, sources close to the couple have revealed that there is more to the story.

According to the People magazine, Meghan and Harry were disappointed with the reception to their recent docuseries and Prince Harry’s memoir. Both of which were intended to educate the Royal Family members on how their bubble can be destructive to outsiders. The prince wanted to convey a message of reconciliation and apology from his family to Meghan. However, this message was not received, and he ended up breaking his relationship with his father and brother.

During the promotion of his memoir, Prince Harry stated that he wanted only an apology from his family members so that he could reconcile with them. However, this did not happen, and the prince was left feeling isolated and unsupported. As a result, he has decided to attend the coronation of King Charles III alone.

Meghan Markle, on the other hand, is not attending the coronation due to the personal animosity toward her in England. As per reports, she wanted to attend the event and support her father-in-law, but the scrutiny that she receives outweighs the support that she would receive in such an event.

A source close to Meghan and Harry spoke to People magazine and said, “What they wanted wasn’t achieved. But at the end of the day, he’s going there to support his dad. Things are strained. Meghan wants to be there to support her father-in-law, but at the same time, the scrutiny she receives outweighs the support. It would have been quite significant if Harry hadn’t attended his father’s coronation, but I’m not surprised Meghan isn’t going given the circumstances.”

The couple’s departure from the Royal Family and their subsequent public appearances have been followed by controversy and criticism from the media and public alike. The couple has spoken out about the pressure and scrutiny they faced while members of the family, particularly Meghan.

The recent reports of their absence from King Charles III’s coronation highlight the ongoing tensions within the Royal Family. However, it remains to be seen whether the couple will be able to reconcile with their family members in the future.


Ultimately, it is clear that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle will likely not have their way when it comes to the Coronation. Despite their wishes for a more modern and inclusive ceremony, the traditions and protocols of the royal family are deeply ingrained, and it is unlikely that significant changes will be made for their benefit. While this may be disappointing for the couple, it is a reminder that the royals operate within a specific framework of etiquette and responsibility, and that even those within the family must abide by certain rules and expectations. Regardless of the outcome, however, it is clear that the public will be watching closely to see what happens on the big day – and for better or for worse, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are sure to remain some of the most captivating figures in the royal family.

As one of the most anticipated royal events of the decade drew near, the world was abuzz with talk of King Charles III’s coronation. However, a sudden development has left many questioning the monarch’s choice to cancel a long-planned tribute to his grandchild Prince Archie. The move has sparked controversy and speculation among royal watchers, leaving many wondering what the future holds for this young prince and his family. In this article, we explore the reasons behind this decision, and what it could mean for the future of the royal family.


Prince Archie’s Birthday Plans Affected by Prince Harry’s RSVP Delay

On May 6, the United Kingdom will crown King Charles III. This same day also marks the birthday of Prince Archie, the son of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. Previously, Prince Harry’s father, King Charles III, had planned to raise a toast to Prince Archie on his birthday. However, due to Prince Harry’s delayed decision to attend the coronation, the plans were scrapped.

Prince Harry had initially planned to attend the coronation ceremony and then return to California. However, this plan has been complicated by the fact that Meghan Markle remains in their home in Montecito with both Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet.

Additionally, Prince Harry has mostly enemies within the Royal Family at the moment, with only Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie being his allies during the coronation. As a result, he is not expected to take part in either the King’s Procession or the Coronation Procession, and is likely to be absent from the Buckingham Palace Balcony.

Some speculate that Prince Harry delayed his RSVP to the coronation because he wanted recognition from the Royal Family for both of his children. There are also reports that he wanted to have a proper birthday celebration for his son, but overlapping schedules prevented it from happening.

Regardless of the reason for his delay, King Charles III has decided not to toast for Prince Archie, as he sees no reason to do so without any Sussex family members in attendance. This decision was made to avoid any drama, especially considering how young the children are.

While Prince Harry will attend the coronation, it is unlikely he will remain for long, as he has mostly enemies within the Royal Family at the moment. His decision to leave early will likely result in him missing the lunch with the rest of the royals.

At the end of the day, Meghan Markle’s decision to remain in California with her children during this tense moment for the Royal Family is understandable. This way, the family can avoid any unnecessary drama, which is especially important given the young age of Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet.

In conclusion, Prince Harry’s delayed RSVP to the coronation has affected plans for Prince Archie’s birthday celebration. However, given the tensions within the Royal Family at the moment, the decision to avoid any drama by King Charles III is understandable.


In the end, it seems that King Charles III has decided to prioritize the traditions and symbols of the monarchy over any personal sentiments. While some may see this as a missed opportunity to celebrate the young prince’s birthday, others may argue that it is important to uphold the dignity and solemnity of the coronation ceremony. Either way, it is clear that even small decisions can have a significant impact when it comes to the royal family, and we will continue to watch and analyze their actions with fascination and curiosity.