Elon Musk’s Departure From Trump Administration: A Timeline

Musk’s Exit From Trump’s Government

Elon musk,CEO of Tesla and SpaceX,concluded his time as a special government employee in President Donald Trump’s administration in May 2025.His departure followed disagreements over policy and frustrations with the pace of change within the federal government.

A White House official confirmed Musk’s departure to Reuters on May 29, 2025, stating, The dismissal will start tonight. Musk himself acknowledged the end of his term on social media platform X, thanking President Trump for the chance.

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)

Musk’s role was within the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an initiative focused on streamlining the federal government. Despite his exit, the U.S. government asserted that DOGE’s mission would continue.

The DOGE mission will only be stronger as time goes by because it becomes part of life throughout the government, Musk stated.

The Trump administration claimed success in reducing the federal workforce through DOGE, reportedly cutting almost 12%, or 260,000 positions, from 2.3 million federal civilian workers. These reductions were primarily achieved through attrition, buyouts, and early retirement offers, according to a Reuters review.

Disagreement Over the ‘One Big, Lovely Bill Act’

A key point of contention between Musk and the Trump administration was the ‘One big, Beautiful Bill Act.’ Musk publicly disagreed with the bill, arguing that it would increase the deficit and undermine the work of DOGE.

Before Musk Quit Trump: The Untold Story — Elon Musk with his child at the White House (Placeholder Image)

Musk, who had previously been supportive of Trump, voiced his concerns in an interview with CBS News: To be honest, I was disappointed to see a massive shopping bill that increased the budget deficit, not just reducing it, and damaged the work done by the Doge team.

The ‘One Big, Beautiful Bill Act,’ passed by the House of Representatives and submitted to the Senate, proposed tax relief and extensive spending. Critics warned that it could inflate the national deficit by up to $4 trillion over a decade and negatively impact healthcare.

A bill can be large, or it can also be beautiful. But I don’t know whether the two can. That is my personal opinion, Musk commented on the bill.

Frustrations With Federal Bureaucracy

Musk’s tenure in the Trump administration was marked by frustration and challenges in navigating the complexities of the federal government. Despite initial ambitions, he faced resistance and political pushback from entrenched officials.

According to the Associated Press,Musk’s resignation signaled the end of a tumultuous period. He reportedly scaled back his initial goal of cutting expenses from $2 trillion to $150 billion, reflecting his growing frustration with the slow pace of change and resistance to his proposals.

musk’s experience highlights the challenges faced by outsiders attempting to reform established government structures and processes.

FAQ: elon Musk’s Departure

Why did Elon Musk leave the Trump administration? He disagreed with the ‘One Big, Beautiful bill Act’ and faced frustrations with federal bureaucracy.
What was Musk’s role in the administration? He served as a special government employee in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
What were the goals of DOGE? To restructure and reduce the size of the federal government.
How many federal jobs were cut during Musk’s tenure? Approximately 260,000, primarily through attrition, buyouts, and early retirement offers.

Uncertainty Looms for Indonesian Students at Harvard Amidst Trump-Era Policy

The academic futures of numerous Indonesian students at harvard University hang in the balance, caught in the crosshairs of a controversial policy enacted during Donald Trump’s presidency. What began as a domestic issue in the United States quickly evolved into an international concern, impacting students from around the globe.

The Initial Policy and Harvard’s Response

The turmoil started when the U.S. Department of Homeland Security announced the revocation of the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) certification for harvard University. This certification is crucial, serving as the primary mechanism allowing international students to pursue their education in the United States.

SEVP Revocation: The U.S. goverment moved to revoke Harvard’s SEVP certification.
Harvard’s Condemnation: harvard University vehemently opposed the policy.
Legal Action: harvard filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration in Boston Federal Court.

Harvard’s swift response underscored the university’s commitment to its international student body and its opposition to policies perceived as discriminatory. the lawsuit aimed to block the implementation of the policy and protect the educational opportunities of its students.

Legal Battles and Political Reactions

The legal challenge brought by Harvard yielded an initial victory when U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs issued an order to temporarily halt the revocation of the SEVP certification. This decision provided a brief reprieve for international students, but the legal battle was far from over.

After the lawsuit was filed, the US District Judge Allison Burroughs ordered that the Trump government cancel the revocation of SEVP certification.

Judge’s Order: Judge Burroughs suspended Trump’s policy for two weeks.
Follow-Up Sessions: Hearings were scheduled to determine the next steps in the case.
Government’s Response: The Trump administration signaled its intent to appeal the decision.

The political ramifications of the case were evident in the reactions from the White House. Stephen Miller,then Deputy Chief of staff,reportedly labeled Judge Burroughs a “Communist Judge,” highlighting the charged atmosphere surrounding the legal proceedings.

Harvard’s International Student Population

The importance of international students to Harvard University is undeniable. During the academic year in question, nearly 6,800 international students were enrolled, representing approximately 27% of the total student population.

Total International Students: Approximately 6,800.
Percentage of Student Body: 27%.

This substantial international presence enriches the academic environment, fostering diversity and cross-cultural exchange. Policies that threaten this diversity are viewed as detrimental to the university’s mission and values.

Impact on Indonesian Students

The policy had a direct impact on Indonesian students studying at Harvard. The Ministry of Foreign affairs (Kemlu) reported that 87 Indonesian students were affected by the uncertainty surrounding their academic futures.

The policy has led to uncertainty for the fate of international students from various countries studying at Harvard University, including 87 students from Indonesia, Kemlu spokesman, Roy Soemirat, told reporters.

Number of Affected students: 87 Indonesian students.
Ministry’s response: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs monitored the situation closely.
Communication: Indonesian representatives established communication with the students.

The Indonesian government expressed its concern to the U.S. government,advocating for solutions that would not harm the affected students. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs emphasized the contributions of Indonesian students to education and science in the United States.

Indonesia’s Diplomatic Efforts

The Indonesian government actively engaged in diplomatic efforts to address the concerns of its students. The government conveyed its concerns to the U.S. government, seeking resolutions that would safeguard the academic pursuits of Indonesian students at Harvard.

Roy Soemirat stated:

Indonesian students in the US have so far made many crucial contributions to the advancement of education and science in the US.

The Indonesian government’s proactive approach underscored its commitment to protecting the interests of its citizens studying abroad and ensuring their access to quality education.

Current Status and Ongoing Uncertainty

As of the latest reports, the affected students are awaiting a resolution to the policy dispute.Harvard University continues to challenge the policy, advocating for the rights and opportunities of its international students.

the outcome of this situation will have far-reaching implications for international students and the future of international education in the United States.

FAQ: Impact on Indonesian Students at Harvard

Q: How many Indonesian students were affected?
A: 87 Indonesian students at Harvard University were affected.
Q: What was the U.S. government’s policy?
A: The U.S. government moved to revoke the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) certification for Harvard University.
Q: What did the Indonesian government do?
A: The Indonesian government expressed its concern to the U.S. government and provided assistance to the affected students.
Q: What was Harvard’s response?
A: Harvard filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration to block the policy.

Trump’s government

Before Musk Quit Trump: The Untold Story