The Slow Burn of Sanctions: How Russia is Adapting to Western Pressure
Despite assertions of critically important impact, the economic pressure exerted โคon russia through โWesternโ sanctions is proving to be a complex and evolving situation. While undeniably causing hardship, the measures โare not delivering the swift, crippling โขblow initially anticipated, and Russia is demonstrating a remarkable capacity to adapt.
The energyโค sector, a primary target โคof sanctions, is experiencing clear strain. Russia is being forced to offerโ substantial discounts – reportedly between 30 and 40โฃ percentโข – onโฃ liquefied natural gas exports to China, a clear indication of diminished bargaining power. However, the issue isn’t necessarily a reduction in volume of exports. A significantโ portion of Russian โoil continues to flow to Chinaโฃ via pipelines, specifically the โขmore expensive ESPOโฃ crude, which is largelyโ immune to US sanctions.
The โmore pressing problem lies in the logistical bottlenecks emerging in the global โoil market. A growing number of โtankers – โคat least eleven currently – are stalled off the coast of India, unable โto unload their Russian cargo. This has contributed to a โsurge in oil stored on tankers worldwide, exceeding levels seen even during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. Bloombergโข reports Russian oil volumes held in tankers have risen by 16% sence late August,reaching 175โ million barrels.
Adding to the complexity, a pattern of evasive maneuvers is developing. โฃTankers transporting Russian โoil areโค increasingly disabling their tracking systems, suggesting attempts to obscure cargo transfers.โฃ Others are setting sail without designated final destinations, hinting atโ a growing reliance on shadow fleets and opaque trading routes.
While these disruptions are impacting Russia’s oil-related โคtax revenues – a decline โขof over 24%โข was recorded last month – the overall โคeffect โฃis somewhat mitigated by a โshift in the composition of Russia’s budget. Oil revenues now represent less than a quarter of total income, down from 40% in recent years. As โคVasily Astrov, a Russiaโข expert at โคthe Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, points out, similar โฃsanctionsโ imposed earlier by โฃthe Biden management on Gazprom Neft and Surgutneftegaz had a limited long-term impact, as Russia successfully circumvented them.
Further โฃsanctions,set to impact 80% of Russian oil production โby November 21st,areโข expected to face โขsimilar challenges. Sergei Vakulenko,a โformer Gazprom Neftโข manager now โat the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center,argues thatโข Russian oil companies are learning to navigateโ the new landscape. โ He emphasizes theโค importance of consistent enforcement ofโ sanctions and the price cap, warning that prolonged pressure, while ultimately weakening the Russian economy, could also accelerate the progress of choice oil markets outside the western financialโฃ system, โfurthering the trend towards โฃdeglobalization.
Ultimately, the effectiveness of oil sanctions hinges on controlling global demand, a feat that remains elusive. Asโ expert Benigni succinctly puts it, “Oil sanctions only make sense if you can control demand.But that is not possible โฃso far.” The situationโ highlights the inherent difficulties in using economic pressure to achieve geopolitical goals, particularly in a globally interconnected energy market.