“`html
US Tariffs Likely to Hold Firm Amid Ongoing Trade Negotiations
Washington D.C. – August 3, 2025 – The United States is unlikely to reduce the recently imposed tariffs on numerous countries, according
“`html
Washington D.C. – August 3, 2025 – The United States is unlikely to reduce the recently imposed tariffs on numerous countries, according
“`html
Table of Contents
Washington, D.C. – President Donald Trump’s enterprising tax and spending bill teetered on the brink of collapse early Thursday as Republican leaders in the U.S. Congress struggled to quell a rebellion within their own ranks. The bill, a cornerstone of Trump’s domestic agenda, faces stiff opposition over concerns about its impact on the national debt and social safety net programs.
Trump is pushing for final approval of his senate-passed “One Big beautiful Bill” in the House of Representatives. However, the legislation is encountering resistance from various factions within the Republican party, primarily due to provisions that are projected to substantially increase the national debt while simultaneously enacting substantial cuts to social programs.
As of midnight, House Speaker Mike Johnson was still holding open a crucial procedural vote, the last hurdle before the bill could be considered for final approval. This occurred more than two hours after the vote was initially called, signaling the depth of the internal divisions. Johnson’s team was reportedly engaged in intense behind-the-scenes negotiations with dissenting Republicans who had either voted against the bill or remained undecided.
Did You Know? The U.S. national debt surpassed $34.6 trillion in early 2024, raising concerns about long-term economic stability [[1]].
Originally approved by the House in May, the sweeping legislation narrowly passed the Senate on Tuesday by a single vote. It then returned to the House for a final vote on the Senate’s revisions. The package fulfills several of trump’s campaign promises, including increased military spending, funding for a large-scale migrant deportation initiative, and allocating $4.5 trillion to extend tax relief measures from his first term.
However, the bill is projected to add an estimated $3.4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. It also includes significant cuts to the Medicaid health insurance program, the largest as its inception in the 1960s. These proposed cuts have sparked considerable controversy and fueled opposition from both moderate and conservative Republicans.
While moderate House members fear that the cuts will jeopardize their re-election prospects, fiscal conservatives argue that the promised savings fall short by hundreds of billions of dollars. Speaker Johnson faces a delicate balancing act, as he can afford to lose only a handful of votes among the more than two dozen Republicans who have expressed reservations about the bill.
Republican leaders had initially hoped to quickly approve the package on Wednesday afternoon, with a buffer of two days before Trump’s self-imposed July 4th deadline. However, the 887-page bill only passed the Senate after numerous revisions that shifted the house-passed version further to the right.
the Senate vote saw the loss of one conservative republican, who opposed adding to the nation’s $37 trillion debt burden, and two moderates, who were concerned about nearly $1 trillion in healthcare cuts.Some estimates suggest that as many as 17 million people could lose their health insurance, and numerous rural hospitals could be forced to close as a result of the bill’s provisions.
Early warning signs emerged as the package encountered difficulties during one of the initial procedural votes. A vote that typically takes only a few minutes remained open for seven hours and 31 minutes, making it the longest House vote in history.
Johnson has indicated that he is relying on Trump to exert pressure on wavering Republicans, as he has done in the past to salvage contentious House votes. The president has reportedly spent weeks attempting to persuade republicans who are torn between angering constituents who rely on social programs and incurring his displeasure.
Trump directly addressed the situation on his Truth Social platform, questioning the Republican holdouts and suggesting that their opposition was costing them votes and displeasing his “MAGA” base.
Pro Tip: Track the bill’s progress on congress.gov for real-time updates and detailed legislative information.
House Democrats have announced their intention to campaign against the bill in the 2026 midterm elections, citing analyses that portray it as a historic transfer of wealth from the poorest Americans to the wealthiest. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries condemned the bill as a “disgusting abomination.”
| Metric | Value | Source | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Projected Debt Increase (over 10 years) | $3.4 Trillion | Congressional Budget Office estimate | |||||||||||||||||||
| Potential Healthcare Coverage Loss | Up to 17 Million
Bangladesh Seeks Trade deal with US to Avert Tariff Hikes on GarmentsTable of Contents
Dhaka is scrambling to finalize a trade agreement with the united States before looming tariffs threaten its vital garment industry, the world’s second-largest garment manufacturer. With the July 9th deadline fast approaching, Bangladesh is offering to boost imports of U.S. goods, including Boeing aircraft, wheat, cotton, and oil, in exchange for tariff relief. Bangladesh Proposes Trade Package to Reduce DeficitBangladesh has proposed a reciprocal trade agreement to the United States in an effort to avert potentially devastating tariffs on its garment exports. The proposal aims to reduce the trade deficit by increasing Bangladesh’s imports of key U.S. products. This includes a significant purchase of 14 Boeing aircraft, along with increased volumes of wheat, cotton, and oil from U.S. farms. Mahbubur Rahman, a top commerce official, stated that the government is “hopeful of reaching a win-win agreement” and that a meeting between officials from both countries was scheduled for July 8th. The U.S. currently represents 20% of Bangladesh’s ready-made garment exports. Did You Know? Bangladesh’s economy is growing faster than those of its neighbors and is likely to shed its “Least Developed Country” status by 2024 [[2]]. Trump-Era tariffs Loom Over Garment IndustryThe potential tariffs stem from measures enacted earlier in 2025, when Bangladesh was hit with a 37% tariff on certain goods, more than double the existing 16% levy on cotton products. While the introduction of these tariffs was initially suspended until July 9th,a baseline 10% levy remains in place. In 2024, Bangladesh exported $8.36 billion worth of goods to the United States, while imports from the U.S. totaled $2.21 billion, according to data from the Bangladesh Bank and the National Board of revenue. Industry Leaders Express Mixed ReactionsWhile the government expresses optimism,concerns linger within the garment industry. Mahmud Hasan Khan, president of the Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA), warned that the existing 10% tariff is already impacting exporters and that further increases could led to a loss of U.S. buyers. However, Mohammad Hatem, president of the Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BKMEA), remains optimistic about a positive outcome before the July 9th deadline. He argues that ultimately, higher tariffs would hurt U.S. buyers, who would face increased prices. Pro Tip: Monitoring trade negotiations and diversifying export markets can help businesses mitigate risks associated with tariff fluctuations. Bangladesh’s Garment Exports to the US: Key Figures
Government Intervention and diplomatic EffortsInterim leader Muhammad Yunus recently spoke with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, assuring him that Dhaka is actively working with U.S. officials to finalize measures that address the U.S. trade agenda. This highlights the high-level engagement aimed at resolving the tariff dispute. Evergreen Insights: the Importance of Trade for bangladeshBangladesh’s economic trajectory is heavily reliant on international trade, particularly its garment exports. The country has made significant strides in economic advancement, aiming to graduate from its Least Developed Country (LDC) status.Maintaining favorable trade relations with major partners like the United States is crucial for sustaining this growth. Climate change also poses a significant threat to Bangladesh, potentially impacting its agricultural sector and displacing communities [[1]]. Economic stability through trade can help the nation build resilience against these environmental challenges. Frequently Asked Questions About Bangladesh-US Trade Relations
Will bangladesh and the U.S. reach a trade agreement in time? How will these negotiations impact the global garment industry? Share your thoughts in the comments below! Immigrants scramble for clarity after US supreme court birthright ruling – World
written by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor
Supreme Court Ruling Fuels Citizenship ConfusionUncertainty Surrounds Birthright for Children of Non-CitizensThe Supreme Court’s recent decision on birthright citizenship has sparked bewilderment and concern. The ruling, while not directly addressing the legality of restricting birthright, has left many families uncertain about the future of their children’s citizenship status and rights in the U.S. Uncertainty for FamiliesThe court’s conservative majority sided with a request from former President Donald Trump, limiting judges’ power. The decision has created more questions than answers regarding the long-held understanding of birthright citizenship. A 24-year-old Colombian asylum seeker, Lorena, living in Houston, is due to give birth soon and has been reviewing media reports. She expressed worry and confusion about how the ruling might impact her child.
She worries her baby could be stateless. The former president had ordered agencies to deny citizenship to U.S.-born children without at least one parent who is a U.S. citizen or permanent resident. This policy was blocked by district court judges and the case went to the Supreme Court. On Friday, plaintiffs filed an amended lawsuit in Maryland to establish a nationwide class of individuals whose children could be denied citizenship. Potential Patchwork of LawsIf the restrictions aren’t blocked nationwide, they could be applied in the 28 states that didn’t contest them in court, potentially resulting in “an extremely confusing patchwork” across the country, according to policy analyst Kathleen Bush-Joseph. The aim to restrict birthright is part of a broader crackdown on immigration. Trump has characterized automatic citizenship as a lure for immigration. Immigration Advocates RespondFollowing the court’s decision, lawyers and advocates in several Republican-led states received calls from pregnant immigrants and their partners. They were struggling to explain the ruling to clients potentially affected by the unknown outcome of future litigation and how the executive order would be implemented. Lynn Tramonte, director of the Ohio Immigrant Alliance, spoke of an East Asian temporary visa holder with a pregnant wife, worried about his child’s rights. He was focused on the rights within the Constitution.
Advocates have highlighted the severity of Trump’s proposed restrictions. An estimated 150,000 children born in the U.S. each year could be blocked from automatic citizenship.
The Supreme Court also decided that members of the litigation’s two plaintiff groups would still be covered by lower court blocks on the policy. How individuals in states where the policy might be enforced could join the organizations, or how officials would check for membership, remains unclear. Betsy, a U.S. citizen and CASA member, expressed her feelings about the policy.
Nivida, a Honduran asylum seeker in Louisiana, is a member of the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project, and recently gave birth. A pregnant friend without legal status contacted her about the situation in Louisiana.
Since 1868, the 14th Amendment has guaranteed birthright citizenship, stating that anyone born or naturalized in the U.S. is a citizen. Today, approximately 4.5% of births in the U.S. are to undocumented immigrants (Pew Research Center, 2024). As legal challenges continue, the ramifications of the court’s decision will likely remain a source of confusion, particularly for families navigating the complexities of immigration law. Trump Administration to Notify Trading Partners of Forthcoming Tariff RatesTable of Contents
Washington D.C.-The Trump administration is poised to notify its global trading partners about impending unilateral tariff rates within the next two weeks. This move comes as a July deadline approaches for the implementation of steeper levies on numerous economies, signaling a potential shift in international trade dynamics. President Trump informed reporters at the Kennedy Center on Wednesday evening that letters detailing the new trade arrangements would be dispatched to relevant countries imminently. Background on Previous Tariff ActionsIn April, the Trump administration initiated a broad 10% tariff on the majority of U.S. trading partners. Together, higher individual rates were introduced for specific economies, including India and the EU, although these elevated rates were quickly put on hold. Did You Know? The United States International Trade Commission (USITC) provides comprehensive data and analysis on the economic effects of tariffs and trade agreements. Potential Impact and ReactionsThe forthcoming tariff adjustments could trigger a range of responses from affected nations, potentially leading to retaliatory measures and escalating trade tensions.The global economic landscape remains sensitive to these policy shifts. According to a recent report by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), increased trade barriers could negatively impact global economic growth, disrupting supply chains and increasing costs for consumers. Key Dates and deadlinesThe next few weeks are critical as the Trump administration prepares to communicate the specifics of the new tariff rates. The july deadline for the implementation of steeper levies adds further urgency to the situation. Pro Tip: Businesses should closely monitor these developments and assess their potential exposure to the new tariffs. Diversifying supply chains and exploring option markets can help mitigate risks. Comparative Tariff rates: A Summary
The table above illustrates the previous tariff rates imposed in April 2025 and highlights that the forthcoming rates for July 2025 are yet to be announced, creating uncertainty among trading partners. The History of U.S. tariffsTariffs have been a tool of U.S.economic policy since the nation’s founding. Historically, they have been used to protect domestic industries, generate revenue, and exert leverage in international trade negotiations. The Smoot-Hawley Tariff act of 1930, for example, significantly raised tariffs on thousands of imported goods, contributing to the severity of the Great Depression.In more recent decades, the U.S. has pursued a strategy of reducing trade barriers through agreements like the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and membership in the World Trade Organization (WTO). However, the Trump administration has signaled a willingness to re-evaluate these policies and employ tariffs more aggressively. Frequently Asked Questions About U.S. Tariff Policy
What are your thoughts on the potential impact of these new tariffs? How do you think businesses should prepare for these changes? Disclaimer: This article provides general facts and should not be construed as financial or legal advice. Consult with a qualified professional for specific guidance. Share this article and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates on global trade and economic policy. Across the nation, citizens are voicing their opposition to the Trump-Musk government overhaul, sparking major “Hands Off” protests. This article explores the causes and scope of the nationwide demonstrations,detailing the core concerns behind the protests against the current management’s policies and the impact they are having. Learn about the key issues and the voices driving the movement against the Trump-musk government. nationwide Protests Erupt Against Trump-Musk Government OverhaulThousands across the U.S. and Europe voice opposition to President Trump’s policies and government restructuring led by Elon Musk. Published: April 6, 2025 Mass Demonstrations Sweep the NationWashington D.C. became the epicenter of widespread discontent Saturday as thousands converged on the National Mall to protest President Donald Trump’s management and its efforts, spearheaded by Elon Musk, to reshape the government. Organizers estimated that over 20,000 individuals participated in the D.C. rally alone, signaling a meaningful wave of opposition. Across the country,more than 1,200 demonstrations were planned,representing what organizers hoped would be the largest coordinated day of protest. These actions aimed to provide a platform for Trump’s opponents to collectively express their disapproval of a series of The scope of the protests extended beyond U.S. borders, with demonstrations also planned in Canada and Mexico, showcasing international solidarity against the perceived overreach of presidential power. Voices of Protest: From Social Security to “No Kings”In washington, protesters lined Connecticut Avenue, braving gloomy skies and light rain, holding signs bearing slogans such as Terry Klein, a retired biomedical scientist from Princeton, N.J., articulated a sense of widespread concern: David Madden, a 75-year-old army veteran and retired trial lawyer who flew in from Dayton, Ohio, emphasized the perceived injustice and institutional erosion: DOGE’s Impact: Job Cuts and Social Security ConcernsElon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), operating with President Trump’s endorsement, has significantly reduced the federal workforce, eliminating over 200,000 of the 2.3 million federal jobs. While proponents argue this streamlines government, critics point to instances where the cuts have been The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has been especially affected, with layoffs impacting as much as 25% of its workforce, translating to more than 20,000 employees. Social Security Under ScrutinyConcerns over the future of Social Security fueled a significant protest near Baltimore, outside the social Security administration headquarters, a Linda falcao, who will turn 65 in two months, expressed her fears: White House ResponseWhite House assistant press secretary Liz Huston addressed the protesters’ concerns, stating: Trump’s Agenda and Project 2025Many of President Trump’s policy initiatives have faced legal challenges, with lawsuits alleging that he has exceeded his authority in areas such as firing civil servants, deporting immigrants, and reversing transgender rights. critics argue that Trump’s actions align with the agenda of Project 2025, a conservative initiative aimed at reshaping government and consolidating presidential power. Conversely, Trump’s supporters view his actions as a necessary disruption of entrenched liberal interests. European SolidarityDemonstrations extended beyond the United States, with hundreds of Americans living in Europe gathering in cities such as berlin, Frankfurt, Paris, and London to protest the changes in U.S.foreign and domestic policies. In Paris, approximately 200 people gathered, displaying banners with messages such as Timothy Kautz, a Democrats Abroad spokesperson in Frankfurt, emphasized the importance of international solidarity: Older Posts |