Trump Management Argues It Can indefinitely Detain Dreamers, Raising Alarm Over Due Process
SAN ANTONIO, TX – Theโ Trumpโฃ administration is โasserting its โauthority to indefinitelyโ detain individuals protected by the deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, a legal position that has sparked outrage from immigrationโข advocates and raised โserious concernsโค about the erosionโ of due โprocessโฃ rights. The case โขcenters on Catalina Xรณchitl Santiago, a DACA recipient and community activist currently held in Texas, whose detention is being challenged by civil rights groups.
The government’s argument,revealed in court filings,contends that DACA recipients,despite their protected status,can beโฃ held without bond while โfacing deportation proceedings,potentiallyโ for years. This stance marks a notable departure โขfrom previous interpretationsโ of immigration lawโ and could expose hundreds of thousands of Dreamersโ to prolonged, โindefinite detention. A ruling on Santiago’s release is anticipated imminently, and โthe outcome will โคset a crucial precedent for the future of DACA recipients navigating the immigration system.
rep. Delia Ramirez, D-Ill., warned that the administration’s actions represent a dangerous โescalation in tactics to silence dissent. โฃ”As authoritarians, โฃTrump, [Kristi] Noem,โฃ [Stephen] Miller, and the rest ofโค the Administration are abusing their power to silence dissent,” Ramirez stated in โa message to The Intercept. “Despite the legal protections for DACA recipients and green card holders,we areโ witnessing the disappearance of community activists,like Catalina Xรณchitl Santiago,who are challenging the rise of fascismโ in our โขnation.”
Santiago, a vocal advocate for immigrant rights, was detained in late September while organizing againstโฃ potential deportations. Her case has drawn national attention,with advocatesโ arguing her detentionโค is politically motivated and intended to intimidate other activists.โค The government maintains โherโค detention โฃis based on a prior conviction, but critics point to the timing and the โadministration’s โbroader efforts toโ dismantle โprotections for undocumented individuals.
The DACA program, established in 2012, shields โeligible individuals who enteredโฃ the country โas childrenโฃ fromโ deportation โand provides them with work permits. while the programโ has faced legal challenges,including attempts by the Trump โadministrationโ to end โคit,it โฃremains in effect,protecting approximately 580,000 individuals.
The Intercept has reportedโฃ that the administration’s legal argumentโ hinges on aโ narrow interpretation of immigration law,โฃ asserting โขthat DACA โคstatus does not preclude the possibility of โขdetention during deportation โproceedings.This interpretation, if upheld by the courts, could dramatically alter the landscape โforโข DACA recipients, โsubjecting them to the same indefinite detention โpractices applied toโข other individuals facing deportation.
Advocatesโข fear this move signalsโ a broader strategy to target and silenceโ immigrant activists and organizers. “We have to stand up for Dreamers and immigrants and protectโ our โฃcivil and โขconstitutional rights,” Ramirez added. The outcome of Santiago’s case will likely โdetermine the extent to which the Trump administration can pursue thisโฃ strategy.