Tag:

Supreme Court

California Election Redesign & Trump Tariffs: US Politics News

by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor November 5, 2025

written by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor

California Redistricting⁢ & Trump‘s Tariffs: Key Updates

Recent developments focus on California’s congressional districts ‌and a Supreme Court case concerning former President Trump’s tariff policies.

California Congressional Districts: Voters ⁢in California have ⁤approved a redesign of ⁣the⁣ state’s congressional districts, a move seen as a significant win ‌for the Democratic Party as ⁣they prepare for the 2026 congressional elections. The measure aims to bolster the party’s chances of gaining seats in⁣ the House of Representatives.

Newsom‘s Role: California Governor Gavin Newsom has positioned ⁢himself⁢ as a key figure⁢ within the Democratic Party, notably as an opponent to Donald Trump. He has spearheaded California’s efforts in redistricting,‌ intending to counter similar initiatives⁣ undertaken by Republican-led states. The fight for control of the⁢ US House of Representatives, currently held by a slim Republican majority, is central to both parties’ ⁢strategies.

Supreme Court & Trump Tariffs: The Supreme court⁤ is currently reviewing the legality of tariffs imposed‍ by Donald Trump during his presidency. These tariffs, levied on numerous countries including those‍ within the EU, have been challenged regarding the legal basis used ‌for their implementation.

The Legal Challenge: The‌ core ⁤of the case isn’t whether ⁣tariffs are permissible, but rather the justification used by the Trump ‌management. Trump invoked a 1977 emergency law,citing an imbalance in international trade detrimental to the USA as a national emergency. this allowed him to enact tariffs ‍without Congressional approval, a power ‌typically reserved for the US Parliament.

Congressional Authority: An appeals court previously ruled against trump’s use of the emergency law, asserting that tariffs⁣ fall under the ⁣core ⁤competence of Congress. Trump appealed this decision, keeping the tariffs in place while ‌the Supreme Court considers the case.⁣

Upcoming Hearing: The Supreme Court will hold an oral hearing on the matter. Trump is⁣ scheduled to be in Miami during the proceedings ⁤and has ‍characterized the‌ case as one of the most crucial the Court has ever handled,⁣ emphasizing the ⁣significance of tariffs to his presidency.

November 5, 2025 0 comments

Business

Trump’s Tariffs Threaten Swiss Toy Company’s Existence

by Priya Shah – Business Editor October 23, 2025

written by Priya Shah – Business Editor

Swiss Toymaker’s Challenge to Trump Tariffs Heads to ‍Supreme Court, Threatening Presidential Authority

WASHINGTON D.C. – A legal battle‍ initiated by Rick Woldenberg, ⁤a Swiss toymaker, is poised to reach the Supreme Court on November 5, perhaps curbing the power of the U.S. presidency to unilaterally impose tariffs. The case, consolidated with several similar actions, challenges President Trump’s use‌ of tariffs as a trade weapon and could have notable global economic repercussions, ⁣particularly for companies like Woldenberg’s.

Woldenberg, not affiliated with either major U.S. political party, filed⁢ a complaint in Washington D.C. at the end of April, arguing that the President exceeded constitutional authority by⁢ enacting far-reaching tariff⁢ regulations without Congressional approval. In May, a district court⁢ judge agreed, ruling that the Constitution requires Congressional⁢ authorization ⁢for ⁢such measures.This‌ initial victory has emboldened⁣ Woldenberg to continue the fight despite facing direct ⁤criticism from President Trump,‌ who has labeled the plaintiffs “enemies of the state” and announced his intention to appear in court.

The core of the dispute centers⁢ on ‌tariffs imposed on goods imported from⁣ various countries, including‍ those impacting‌ Woldenberg’s toy manufacturing business. The U.S. Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate foreign commerce, and Woldenberg’s legal team argues that the President’s actions circumvent this constitutional mandate.

“this trial has no political motivation,” Woldenberg⁣ emphasized. “But we have to fight what’s happening in the United States right now.”

The Supreme Court’s decision could redefine the balance of power between the executive ⁤and legislative branches regarding trade policy. A ruling in favor of Woldenberg and the other plaintiffs would necessitate Congressional approval for future tariffs, potentially offering ⁤relief to Swiss‌ companies and others affected by the Trump administration’s trade policies.

Original article: Mélanie Pfändler
French adaptation: Julien Furrer (RTSinfo)

October 23, 2025 0 comments

World

Title: Trump Appeals Supreme Court Over National Guard Deployment in Chicago

by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor October 18, 2025

written by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor

Trump‍ Management Escalates Chicago National Guard ‌Dispute,‌ appeals to supreme⁤ Court

Washington D.C. – October 18,‍ 2025, 2:46 a.m. ⁢ – The Trump administration is seeking intervention ⁢from the Supreme Court in a legal ‌battle ⁤with the state of⁤ Illinois and the city of Chicago over the planned‌ deployment of National ‌Guard‌ soldiers. The move comes after lower courts ⁣temporarily blocked⁢ the federal government’s attempt to deploy troops to the‌ region against the wishes of state and⁢ local officials.

The dispute centers on the administration’s effort to place Illinois National guardsmen under federal control, ostensibly to protect federal ⁤officers – especially those with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) - and federal property. National Guard personnel from Texas were also reportedly sent to Illinois as part ⁢of the plan.

Chicago and Illinois filed suit against the deployment,‌ arguing the federal government overstepped its authority. A federal court in Chicago initially issued a two-week injunction halting the operation last week.The government appealed to a higher court,⁢ but that court also ‍refused to allow the deployment to proceed, prompting⁣ the appeal to the nation’s highest court.

The administration argues it has the authority⁣ to‍ federalize National Guard units in situations where a rebellion against the government’s authority is threatened or underway. However, a lower court judge reportedly ‍stated in court⁢ last week ‍that she had not been presented ⁤with credible evidence of such a rebellion⁤ in Illinois.

The timing of the dispute coincides with ongoing protests in Chicago against ICE raids. Last week, ‌National guard soldiers were observed on the grounds of‍ an ICE facility in a Chicago suburb, where demonstrations against the immigration agency have been taking⁣ place ⁢for weeks.

the Supreme Court’s composition has shifted ‌significantly during President Trump’s first term, with three appointments filling vacancies due to deaths and a retirement. This has resulted in a more conservative court, ⁣raising the stakes in‌ this legal challenge.

Traditionally, states maintain control over their National Guard units, utilizing them for responses to natural disasters, civil unrest, or internal emergencies. Federal control⁣ is typically reserved⁣ for specific circumstances outlined in ⁤law.

Observers ‍have⁤ suggested the administration’s actions might potentially ⁢be intended to ⁣intimidate political opponents in democratically‍ governed cities and regions.

(Audio available – Artificially generated. More info)

October 18, 2025 0 comments

World

Mississippi executes Charles Crawford for 1993 rape, killing

by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor October 16, 2025

written by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor

Mississippi Executes ⁣Charles ⁤Ray ⁣Crawford for 1993 Rape and‍ Murder

Parchman, MS – Charles Ray ⁢Crawford was executed by ⁣lethal injection in Mississippi on wednesday evening for the 1993 kidnapping, rape, and murder of 20-year-old Kristy ‌Ray, the Mississippi⁤ Department‌ of Corrections confirmed. Crawford, 55, was pronounced dead⁢ at 6:15 p.m. at the Mississippi State Penitentiary ⁣after receiving three drugs, following 31 years on death row.

Crawford ‌abducted Ray from ‍her Tippah County⁢ home, taking her to ‍a cabin ‌where ⁣he reportedly handcuffed, raped, ⁤and then fatally stabbed her in the chest. He was out on ⁣bond⁢ awaiting trial for a seperate⁢ rape case at⁤ the time of the crime. He was convicted and sentenced to death in 1994.

Prior to the ⁤execution, all legal appeals ⁢failed, including a last-minute filing with the U.S. Supreme Court, which declined to intervene. Crawford’s final meal consisted of‌ a double cheeseburger,‌ french fries, ⁢peach cobbler, and chocolate ice cream, according to Marc McClure, regional superintendent for the‌ Mississippi Department of ⁤Corrections.

In his final statement, Crawford addressed his family, saying,⁢ “To‍ my ⁢family, I love you. I’m at peace. I’ve got God’s ‌peace.” He also spoke to ⁣Ray’s family, stating, “To the victim’s family, ‍true closure and true ⁢peace, you cannot⁢ reach that without God.” He ‌then thanked God and closed his eyes.

Mississippi‌ Governor Tate Reeves denied Crawford’s ⁢clemency appeal on Monday, stating that ⁣all necessary procedures were ‍being followed.

This execution marks the ‌second in Mississippi this year, following the ⁣execution of Richard ⁤Jordan on June 25. Nationally, there have been 38 executions in the U.S. in‍ 2025,with⁤ Florida⁣ leading with 14,according to the Death Penalty‌ Facts Center. In 2024, 25 executions were carried out across the‌ country.

Crawford’s case was previously featured on ⁢Investigation finding’s Your Worst⁤ Nightmare in a 2019 episode titled ⁢”Behind the Barn.”⁢ Nine protesters were present outside the prison during the execution.

October 16, 2025 0 comments

News

Supreme Court Approves Extradition of Jossimar Cabrera to US

by Chief editor of world-today-news.com October 14, 2025

written by Chief editor of world-today-news.com

Supreme Court ‍Authorizes Extradition ‍of Jossimar Cabrera to U.S. in Sheylla Gutiérrez Murder Case

Lima, Peru – October 14, 2025 – The Peruvian Supreme Court has ruled admissible the extradition ⁣of ⁢Jossimar‌ Cabrera to the United States to face charges in connection with the death of ‍Sheylla Gutiérrez,⁣ a Peruvian woman found murdered in ⁤the U.S. ‌The‍ decision, announced today, clears a importent legal hurdle in the case ⁣and paves the way for Cabrera’s ⁤transfer to American authorities.

The extradition ⁢request,pursued by U.S. law enforcement, ⁤centers on allegations that Cabrera ‌is responsible for ⁣Gutiérrez’s ⁤death. ⁤Gutiérrez was discovered‌ deceased⁣ in the United States, prompting an examination that led to Cabrera being identified as a⁣ person of interest and subsequently charged. The ruling impacts the Gutiérrez family, who have been advocating for‌ justice, and sets a precedent for international cooperation in homicide investigations ‌involving Peruvian citizens. Cabrera’s lawyer indicated the extradition could occur within a month.

According to statements from the Gutiérrez family’s legal ‌counsel, the extradition process could be completed‍ in ‍under a month.The case has garnered significant attention in both Peru and the United States, raising awareness about domestic‌ violence and the⁢ complexities⁤ of international‍ extradition laws.⁢

Sheylla gutiérrez’s death sparked widespread grief and calls for accountability. Cabrera⁢ was ⁤previously a‍ suspect in the case, and the Supreme⁣ Court’s decision allows U.S. authorities to pursue⁢ prosecution in American courts.

October 14, 2025 0 comments

World

Trump’s Supreme Court Allows Freeze on Foreign Aid

by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor September 27, 2025

written by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor

Supreme Court Permits Trump Administration to Freeze $4 Billion ‌in Foreign Aid

WASHINGTON ‍- The Supreme Court,⁢ in a 6-3⁤ decision, has temporarily allowed the ⁤Trump administration to withhold approximately $4 billion in congressionally approved foreign aid,⁣ reversing a lower court order that compelled the release⁣ of the‍ funds.⁤ The ruling, issued Friday, hinges on the court’s assessment that the plaintiff aid organizations likely lack standing to challenge the administration’s actions and that presidential authority in foreign policy outweighs potential harm to aid recipients.

The decision marks the latest instance of the Supreme Court siding with the Trump administration, bolstering its “America First” foreign policy agenda. Since returning to office‍ in January, president ⁤Trump froze U.S.⁤ foreign aid and subsequently‌ eliminated over ⁤80% ‌of U.S. development aid programs, prompting widespread concern‍ among aid organizations globally. USAID officially ceased operations on July 1st.

the administration argues the expenditure of funds on foreign‍ aid, UN peacekeeping missions, ⁢and democratic promotion⁤ initiatives conflicts with the President’s foreign policy‍ priorities. While the court’s action‍ suspends the ⁣lower court’s order and allows for ‍the ⁤temporary freeze, it is not⁤ a ‍final ruling. ‍The case will continue to be litigated in lower courts.

The three liberal justices on the nine-member ‌court dissented from the majority opinion. The U.S.Constitution grants budgetary authority to Congress, but the administration maintains it has the power⁣ to redirect funds based⁣ on policy considerations. The Supreme ⁤Court has consistently favored the⁤ government in cases reviewed ⁢since‍ President Trump’s return to office.

September 27, 2025 0 comments

Newer Posts

Older Posts