Canada Braces for Larger Deficit as Carney Prioritizes Investment
Prime Ministerโข Mark Carney is expected โขto significantlyโข increase Canada’s budget deficit as the government โฃramps up spending on โฃmilitary and infrastructureโฃ projects. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg predict a C$70 billion ($50.6 billion) deficit forโ the current fiscal year – over 2% of GDPโข and 66% โhigher than the government’s Decemberโค forecast.
Carney confirmed plans for a “substantial” deficit,exceeding last year’s C$48โ billion shortfall,citing the negative economic impact of the ongoing U.S. tradeโข war, which has reduced revenues and necessitated support for industry and workers. He maintains the increasedโ spending will โฃ”buildโ a much stronger Canada moving forward.”
While debt levels remain manageable comparedโฃ to other G7 โnations, 11 โขof 12 economists surveyed anticipate a rise in Canada’s federal net debtโค as โคa percentage of GDPโ over โthe next two years. This comes after Carney outlined billions in โฃnew expenditures following his recent election victory, focusing on โdefense, affordable housing, and mitigating โthe effects of U.S. tariffs.
The upcoming October budget,โ jointly presented by โขCarney and Finance Minister โฃFrancois-Philippe Champagne, is framed as aโค balance of “austerity and investment.” The government is simultaneouslyโฃ pursuing cost-cutting measures, including a Cabinet directive toโ find 15% savings and reforms to federal procurement processes.Concerns โขover public sector bloat – reaching a record high in 2024 – are being addressed through โฃattrition, though some โคagencies anticipate job cuts.
A key โขelement โof the budget will be a separation of operating expenses and capitalโ investments. Economists are divided on the impact of this change, with four predicting negative consequences for clarity, five anticipating no impact, and three viewing it positively. Critics, like Stuart Paul of Bloomberg Economics, argue the move is “just marketing,” as “investment” items still represent expenditures requiring financing and could obscure the true size of the fiscal โshortfall. Carney insists on full transparency regarding investment classifications.