Here’s a breakdown of the text, focusing on the key points and arguments:
Main Idea:
The article discusses the growing debate in Germany and Italy about repatriating their gold reserves held in the United States, primarily at the Federal Reserve (Fed). The concern stems from increasing geopolitical uncertainty, distrust in American monetary policy, and the fear that the US could potentially politicize gold reserves for its own purposes.
Key Points:
Significant gold Reserves: Germany and Italy hold considerable gold reserves, ranking second and third globally, respectively, after the United States. A significant portion of these reserves is stored in the US, representing a value exceeding $245 billion.
Historical Context: Historically, both countries chose to store gold in the US due to the perceived stability and security of the Federal Reserve.
Shifting Concerns: The article highlights a change in outlook driven by several factors:
Geopolitical Instability: Increased global uncertainty makes countries more cautious about the location of their strategic assets.
Trump’s Criticism of the Fed: Former President trump’s attacks on the Federal Reserve’s independence raised concerns about potential political interference in monetary policy.
fear of Politicization: There’s a growing fear that the US could use its control over foreign gold reserves as a tool for political or economic pressure.
Political Reactions:
Germany: The issue of gold repatriation has been discussed for years. In 2013, Germany began repatriating a portion of its gold from New York and Paris. There’s broad political consensus in Germany for further repatriation.
Italy: In 2019, giorgia Meloni (now Prime Minister) called for the immediate repatriation of Italian gold. While she hasn’t emphasized the issue as Prime Minister, the underlying concerns remain.
Arguments for Repatriation:
National Security: Gold is considered a strategic resource that should be kept secure, especially during times of uncertainty.
Monetary Sovereignty: Repatriation is seen as an act of economic sovereignty, ensuring that a country has direct control over its assets.
Avoiding Foreign Control: Bringing gold back home prevents a foreign state from potentially using it against the country’s interests. Arguments Against Repatriation:
Logistical and Operational Costs: repatriating gold involves significant expenses.
Current Italian Government’s Stance: The current Italian government, while historically advocating for repatriation, doesn’t seem to be prioritizing the issue at the moment.
In essence, the article presents a situation where historical trust in the US as a safe haven for gold reserves is being challenged by new geopolitical realities and concerns about American monetary policy. This is leading to renewed calls for Germany and Italy to bring their gold back home.
, Manchester United trails leader Liverpool by a significant margin – more than double the points, with Liverpool having played one game less. This stark reality underscores the team’s struggles.</p>
<p>The club’s decision to replace manager Eric Ten Hag with Huben Amorim in October, hoping for a turnaround, has yielded disappointing results. While Amorim initially showed promise with two wins and a draw in his first three games, the subsequent eight matches have seen only two wins and six losses. “Coach Huben Amorim recorded 4 wins, 1 draw, and 6 losses in 11 games since taking charge of Manchester United,” according to reports.</p>
<figure>
<img decoding=)
Manchester united’s Steep Decline: relegation Looms Large
